Then something happened. After watching the LA debate I found myself cheering for her. I was impressed as she listed off all her accomplishments in her career. I started taking another look at her. And since that time I've really moved into her corner and fear what would happen if Obama wins.
Why? Because I don't think he can live up to all the change and hope he promised. After 8 years of the worst administration in history, I'm ready for a big swing back to the left. And I don't think you can get there by saying you'll reach across the aisle and sing Kumbaya on every bill. Because if the Republicans know you want their support on everything, because that's what you promised the voters--consensus, it won't take long for them figure out they have the leverage on every bill. If there's any kind of a split Congress, the Republicans will be able to water down every single piece of liberal legislation Obama proposes. For example, do you really think Republicans will stand for 80% reduction in emissions to stop global warming? No, (a) because global warming doesn't exist except in Al Gore's fantasy world and (b)because it's bad for business. So either Obama will have to play partisan hardball or cave to some of their demands. And possibly one Senator will hold the bill hostage until he gets some concession in another bill he doesn't like. It's like negotiating with terrorists--if they know you will cave, they will hold out every time. It becomes a slippery slope. It sounds a little too much like appeasement for my taste (and more like Joe Kennedy Sr. than JFK).
That's why I don't think he can achieve all the change he promises, and that the Democratic base wants. I understand he's trying to appeal to moderates and independents, but I want a little less compromise with Republicans and tougher legislation to achieve the goals of Democrats. That's why John Edwards' image as a fighter appealed to me. I don't want hugs and kisses. I want to win for a change. And I don't think we can get universal health care, a new climate change policy and treaty, and energy independence by working with Republicans. It's time for strong leadership by Democrats, and either they need to follow or get out of the way.
I've listened to all the arguments against her. I know the Clintons are ruthless politicians. I know they aren't clean of special interest money. (I don't think any politician is-even Edwards and his trial lawyer money). I don't see how you can compete otherwise unless we go to full public financing of campaigns. And most absurdly, I've heard that Bill would be running the country; not only is such a statement condescending to women but absurd because it violates the Constitution and she would be impeached in a heartbeat. I'm willing to overlook all her shortcomings for the sake of change. Because to me, the biggest change would be having a woman in office. You can't tell me that a woman wouldn't approach every issue differently from a man. And maybe it's time that we tried that approach to get this country back on track.
Comments are closed on this story.