My lesson from 2004: aside from party line voters, voting for many people is an emotional decision. OK, feel free to call me naive.
Watching the debate, from my partisan perspective and believing that I am more rational than emotional, I came away with the perception that Obama ended up more often than not playing defense and responding to questions rather than leading. Like some others, I felt that the debate ended up being a narrow positive for McCain. It appears that what I and other partisans thought really doesn't matter. Many news reports, polls an focus groups from sources across the political spectrum concerning what undecided voters thought, or more importantly felt, is the real story. They apparently didn't like McCain so much, and not because of facts (whether you believe them to be true or false). They didn't like him because of their perception of him as being contemptuous, patronizing, condescending, churlish, disrespectful or grumpy. McCain wouldn't look at Obama and seemed as though he could hardly stand being on the same stage as him, despite the fact that Obama has earned the right to be there having endured a grueling, bruising primary fight. This might be cheered by the Republican base (who will vote for McCain, no matter what) and reviled by the Democratic base (who will vote for Obama, no matter what), but the majority of undecided voters seem to have had an emotional reaction that didn't favor McCain. If McCain generates the same reaction during the next two debates, facts aside, his numbers will slide and Obama will face an easy victory.
But, perhaps I'm just being emotional.
Comments are closed on this story.