Conor Friedersdorf, the writer of the Atlantic article, states the issue in a nutshell
The writer, Zev Chafets, capably sketches his subject's biography, and correctly intuits that any worthwhile feature story on the 27-year-old must grapple with the ethical questions raised by his activism. But the grappling is woefully incomplete, leaving readers unaware of the most damning critiques of O'Keefe's work and unable to render an informed judgment.
The Times article never mentioned the CNN reporter set up complete with sex toys that was foiled when one of O'Keefe's helpers became uncomfortable and ratted on him. The Times article never mentioned the California state's attorney general's investigation of the Acorn incident with the finding that Acorn and its employee, Vera, is innocent or that Vera is suing O'Keefe. And in my opinion Chefets worst offense is comparint O'Keefe to Michael Moore.
So the New York Times fucked up yet again. What else is new?
Comments are closed on this story.