For the first time, the identity of the anti-christ is not revealed
Laura Clawson on Monday Sept. 29, 2014 on Daily Kos wrote a post titled. “If you thought House Republicans were crazy now, just wait” concerning among others, Ryan Zinke, candidate for the US House seat being vacated by former congressman Steve Daines, who is running for the Senate seat being vacated by retiring Sen. Max Baucas (D.-Mont.)
According to Laura Clawson, Ryan Zinke, a former Navy SEAL team member, “has taken on a decidedly more confrontational tone, saying the United States is losing its focus on the real enemy, Mrs. Clinton, whom he called the Antichrist.”
http://www.dailykos.com/...
On the same subject, Amanda Terkel wrote a article for the Huffington Post “Ryan Zinke, GOP House Candidate, Calls Hillary Clinton The 'Anti-Christ'” posted on: 01/31/2014 and updated: 02/04/2014 which said, “Ryan Zinke, a former Navy SEAL and state senator who is now running for Congress in Montana, said during a campaign stop this week that he is worried the country is losing sight of the real threat to the nation: Hillary Clinton.”
“We need to focus on the real enemy,” said Zinke last week, referring to Clinton, according to the Bigfork Eagle. He also called the former Secretary of State the "anti-christ.”
[Ryan Zinke, GOP House Candidate, Calls Hillary Clinton The 'Anti-Christ'
Posted: 01/31/2014 12:39 pm EST Updated: 02/04/2014 1:59 pm EST]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
Republicans and conservatives in general have been calling Democratic Presidents the anti-Christ for decades. But this is a new low as well as an amazing display of Biblical ignorance. To state that a woman could be the anti-christ contradicts 2000 years of Biblical interpretation from scholars of every religious background.
Today’s feminists might demand the same right that a man has to be labeled as the anti-christ, but this is a 1st century conspiracy that can’t be rewritten to comply with modern sensibilities. So, sorry Hillary.
Note to my critics, this is merely an opinion piece and I am entitled to my opinions, so I don’t see any reason to spend hours researching the opinions of other experts, which would end up supporting my positions and opinions anyway. So there.
More under the sqiggle.
I was born in 1950 in Georgia and thus I was ten years old when President Kennedy was elected. Georgia voted for President Kennedy but he probably could not have won Georgia in a second term. I was a studious child and read newspapers and news magazines at every opportunity. I also listened intently but sadly to grown-ups opinions when they complained about President Kennedy’s policies mainly because of his support for civil rights and integration.
I remember very clearly that among the various Kennedy haters around the country were so called religious leaders who denounced JFK as the anti-christ. For those of you, dear readers, who were not blessed with a fundamentalist religious education, the anti-christ is a person who will fool the people of the world into believing that he is actually the son of God, who will bring world peace, and especially peace in the Middle East. Some readers might think that world peace and a real peace treaty in the Middle East would be a desirable thing. But you’re wrong.
According to the Bible, one of the many miracles that the anti-christ will use to amaze the world will be that he will rise from the dead. While we don’t know who the anti-christ will be, we can be certain he won’t be a US president. He will be a prominent world citizen, almost certainly European, who will be fatally wounded in the head, apparently die, and then miraculously come back to life. This will be the undeniable proof of his bona fides that he is the God or the son of God that he claims to be.
Poor Russian President Gorbachov was accused by ignorant so-called religious Americans of being the anti-christ because he had a prominent birth mark on his head. But true Bible scholars knew that Gorbachov could not be the anti-christ because he was born in the Soviet Union. I will explain that below.
When President Kennedy was shot in the head and killed in Dallas, the conservative religious leaders went on full alert. Their worst paranoid delusion was coming true before their very eyes. Some of the US military leaders who were in the examination room when JFK’s body was autopsied must have shared this delusion as that is the most likely reason why his brain was removed from his body and not returned. Later, it was announced that the brain was “lost.” JFK the anti-christ can’t come back to life without his brain.
But of course, JFK was not the anti-christ, and never could be because he
was born in the US. I will explain why at some point.
Check out http://mklasing.wordpress.com/... for a humorous take on Jimmy Carter as anti-christ.
Because Jimmy Carter had ties to the Trilateral Commission, Hal Lindsey implied that the Trilaterals were conspiring to take over the world with Jimmy Carter as President doing the heavy lifting. Left Behind author Tim LaHaye also implied that Carter was the anti-christ, but he may have only being trying to sell more books. But it’s hard to make the connection of Carter as the anti-christ when he is an avowed Christian and Baptist Sunday school teacher. Still, Jimmy Carter can not be the anti-christ because he was born in Georgia.
While some liberals or crazy right wingers argued that President Reagan and President George Bush were actually the anti-christ, that theory never resonated with the religious extremists with Republican affiliations. But these two individuals could not be the anti-christ because they were both born in the US. I will get around to explaining that eventually.
President Bill Clinton was identified as the anti-christ almost from the beginning of his administration.
See http://www.youtube.com/... for an explanation of some of President Clinton’s evil deeds, which are resonating even today.
For example, many citizens would be surprised to learn that the signing of the PLO-Israel Peace Treaty in 1993, while seemingly commendable “is an abomination to the Lord.” According to this expert, Christians worldwide were “misled by the so-called Christian and church leaders,” and as a result “celebrated the signing of the Israel-PLO Peace Treaty,” when they shouldn’t have. Somehow this Treaty showed the “unbelief of Jews and Christians in the Word of God and God Himself.”
And “Thus, this Peace Accord fulfilled the opening of the 1st Seal in the book of Revelation 6. The work of the Devil (angel of light) is deception, whereby the faith of the Jews were shipwrecked by signing this agreement. There can never be any peace without God's approval.”
According to this author, President Clinton (in the author’s words, a depraved Christian leader and one of the antichrists) committed another great abomination with his proclamation in 2000 that June was 'Gay Pride Month.'
Really, a whole month?
Fortunately for beleaguered heterosexuals, President Bush put a quick end to that, although unfortunately, President Obama re-instituted it. To many conservatives, Obama’s action was very anti-christ like.
For those of you interested in this author’s ideas on how the coming World War 3 will develop in 2013 go to http://www.youtube.com/...
Of course, President Clinton can not be the anti-christ because he was born in Arkansas. Won’t be long now and I’ll explain everything.
These self elected “prophets” of God have been wrong every time when they accused every modern president, as well as many world leaders, of being the anti-christ. With Hilary eliminated because of her gender, it seems there is no one else left for these religious experts to accuse except President Barrack Obama.
The President must have the warm fuzzies to know that despite all the criticism he has suffered during his terms in office, some of which was unwarranted, yet, still he has been nominated by his critics to enjoy the same high honor as all of his recent predecessors, that is, accused of being the anti-christ.
But we know President Obama is not the anti-christ because he was born in Kenya, and no one born in Kenya can ever be the anti-christ. Why is that? Let me finally explain.
Most real religious scholars believe that the Bible teaches that the anti-christ will emerge from the old Roman Empire. That is, from one of the nations surrounding the Mediterranean Sea, plus England and some areas in the Balkans.
Notable modern day countries which can be eliminated as the birth home of the anti-christ include Germany, Russia, the United States, Central and Southern Africa, and all of Asia and the Pacific nations. Thus, no legitimately elected president of the US can be the anti-christ. Period. End of discussion. If only, sigh.
When the Republicans couldn’t find President Obama’s real Kenyan birth certificate, they had no choice but to create a crude forgery, which was quickly denounced by anyone with a lick of sense. I guess that the guys who created the forgery were just some college Republicans with some time on their hands who wanted to pull off a Karl Rovian type of mean spirited political prank. At best the forgery would confirm Tea Baggers belief that President Obama was not a US citizen and almost certainly a Muslim.
What none of the forgers seemed to realize was that they could have hit a trifecta if only they forged a President Obama birth certificate from a former Roman Empire country, such as Libya, Egypt or Morocco. Had they had a lick of religious knowledge, which they obviously didn’t, they could have exposed President Obama as a foreigner, a Muslim and the anti-christ! What a missed opportunity.
Now some Republican is going to read this and proceed to forge a birth certificate for President Obama from Libya, Egypt or Morocco, or some other Mediterranean country, or maybe England, but it’s too late. You blew it, guys. So sad.
All this begs the question, how we will be able to identify the anti-christ when he does make an appearance on the world stage.
One of the clues as to the identity of the anti-christ is that he will put the “mark of the beast” on all of his supporters. He will either kill or starve everyone who refuses the mark, because the refusers will not be allowed to “buy or sell.” That explains why some of the President Obama haters believe that the President conspires to inject all Americans with a chip in their body or a bar code on their palm that will enable the anti-christ’s minions to track every world citizens movements and control every aspect of their lives.
This creation of this and other modern technology has convinced many that we are now entering into the “End Times” or “Last Days.”
But are we?
Bill Nye the Science Guy recently had a debate with Creationist Ken Hamm on the subject Evolution v Creation, but also science v the Bible in general.
Either during the debate or on Bill Nye’s victory tour, he made a statement, to the effect, one of the main difference between science v religion is that science postulates theories that can be proven and repeated, and science can also make predictions based on accumulated scientific facts which can usually prove to be true, although sometimes there is a swing and a miss. Cold fusion, anybody?
And Bill Nye said to the effect it’s not possible to make predictions based on religious theory and or the Bible.
Many people believed that the world as we know it was going to end in December 2012. The Mayan calendar defined that time period as the end of an age. According to Mayan history, there had been several different “ages” all of which ended horribly for the people of the world. According to experts, the Mayan calendar is the most sophisticated calendar ever created, which was based on Mayan astronomical science, which was also the most scientifically sophisticated astronomical science until modern times.
That the world as we know it was going to come to an end was a widespread belief which many people were convinced was true. I remember watching a young couple on TV who were convinced that the world as we know it would come to an end in December 2012. The couple proceeded to max out of their credit cards because they thought they would never receive or have to pay the bills. I assume at some point they filed for bankruptcy because as we all know, the world as we know it did not come to an end in 2012.
There are two reasons why I didn’t max out my credit cards. First, my credit cards were already maxed out, and second, based on my knowledge of the Bible’s explanation of the End Times and the anti-christ, I knew that the world as we know it would not come to an end in December 2012.
Therefore, I made a Bible based prediction that the world as we know it would not end in December of 2012, as so many believed.
I failed to write it down, publish it or even tell anyone my prediction so you will have to take my word for it. However, I can make another prediction today based on the Bible which you can take to the bank.
The end of the world as we know it will not happen before the year 2021 at the minimum and probably 3-4 years or more beyond that. Many people of my age will manage to get out of this world without having to deal with the anti-christ or any of his minions.
How do I know this?
According to the Bible, the anti-christ will rule for 7 years. Since he is not ruling at this time and world events are not such that he will start his rule anytime in the immediate future, the end of the world as we know it is a minimum of 7 years away and certainly more.
The anti-christ will probably begin to assume power after some large natural or man made disaster that affects Europe and the Middle East. While it is often said that he will “rule the world,” the nations of Asia and the Pacific will probably not recognize his authority. Once the anti-christ does assume power, I can confidently predict that the world as we know it will end in 7 years.
By freely sharing this knowledge, readers living during those difficult future times will have the opportunity to make and institute plans for evacuation from the world. You’re welcome.
Jim McMeans
Danielsville, GA