I used to think that Rasmussen, Mason-Dixon, and Gallup were pretty skeevy GOP-friendly polling outfits, but the Quinnipiac folk seem to be giving them a run for their money lately (emphases mine):
It was a lightning bolt from the polling universe: two weeks ago, Quinnipiac University found that the most cited description of the most admired woman in American politics was “liar.”
The media jumped on it. Commentators seized on it as definitive proof that the American electorate distrusts Hillary Clinton.
But the conclusion was a sham.
Back on August 29th, we deconstructed the poll, looked at the internals and found that it was highly misleading. While Quinnipiac presented the poll as evidence that voters associated “liar” with Hillary, we demonstrated that it was Republican and Republican-leaning respondents to the Q-poll who linked Hillary to liar and other derogatory terms (including “bitch”). It is a vastly different thing for Republicans, parroting Fox news and talk radio, to hurl misogynistic insults at Hillary than for all voters to believe Hillary is a liar.
The poll was so slanted that at least one prominent journalist has disavowed it, and Q is being pushed to apologize for it.
More past the jump.
Comments are closed on this story.