All Recent Stories Staff Community Trending From Markos' Desk Comics Community Groups Community Spotlight Civiqs Subscribe Make a Donation

Help Desk Gift a Subscription Jobs About Us Work With Us Advertising Overview

TRUE BLUE REPORT: If Neil Gorsuch were a man of integrity he would decline the S.Ct. appointment

by TrueBlueMajority for Black Star Resistance

Community

(This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Sunday, Feb. 26, 2017 Sunday, Feb. 26, 2017 at 8:58:36pm PST

52430516 - integrity word cloud concept with honesty trust related tags — (c) lculig / 123RF Stock Photo

I was really little, definitely single digits old, so I don’t remember all the details.

I know we were riding in a car, and I know we passed a truck in a relatively deserted parking lot alongside a relatively deserted two lane highway. There was a small handmade sign describing what they were selling. Cigarettes? TVs? I don’t remember.

But the price was very low. A few cars of customers had pulled over. Money was exchanged. I asked my mom why we didn’t stop and buy some of what they were selling.

She didn’t miss a beat before explaining.

Well, the only way they could sell those things for so cheap is they must be selling stolen property.

Huh?

If they stole those things and got them for free, any amount they can sell it for goes right in their pocket because they don’t have any expenses.

Oh. But how do you know it is stolen?

You don’t, but when you see people selling things in that way, sometimes that is the reason. So it’s best not to take a chance.

Take a chance on what?

If someone steals something and then sells it to you, you are committing a crime because you are helping people make money from theft.

Receiving stolen property is wrong, baby. Even if you are not sure, but you think it is stolen, it is best not to take the chance.

Oh. OK.

Throughout the years we would see other trucks parked on the side of other roads, and I would ask—are they selling stolen property, mommy?

I don’t know for sure, baby, but they could be. So we won’t buy anything from them.

In elementary school, I apparently had more personal integrity than the man nominated for the vacant Supreme Court seat.

Receiving stolen property is wrong.

This Supreme Court nomination was stolen.

It was stolen from the President who was elected by the people for a full four year term in 2012.

It was stolen from a man whose educational and professional qualifications are just as stellar as those of Gorsuch.

There is no such thing as the “Biden Rule”.

Republicons are bleating now that winning the 2016 election gives them the right to the seat, because the people voted and that’s what they voted for.

And I have yet to hear any media personality push back on that and say the people also voted in 2012, knowing it was likely that there would be S.Ct. vacancies in the next four years and they wanted Barack Obama to fill them.

Going back further, we all remember how they met on Inauguration Day 2009 vowing to block everything the newly elected Obama proposed, in the hope that would make him a one-term president.

Not only that, Rcons had plans to hold the seat open for FOUR WHOLE YEARS if Hillary had been elected.

Republicons only care about election outcomes when they win.

When they lose, they subvert the will of the election in every way they can, even when it is clear that we outnumber them.

They are liars and it amazes me that anyone believes anything they say given their poor track record. On this particular subject, they redefine hypocrisy every time they open their mouths.

But this isn’t even about the Republicon Party stealing the Supreme Court seat any more.

This is about Gorsuch being able to live with it.

A man who enjoys being called America's "most influential conservative Christian thinker" had the nerve to write this a few weeks ago:

If Democrats are looking for a point of vulnerability in either Gorsuch’s integrity or impartiality, they won’t find it. He is basically a Boy Scout… a man of probity who holds himself to the highest ethical standards.

So far I only aspire to be one of America’s most influential liberal Christian thinkers, but I beg to fcuking differ.

What does a person of integrity do when faced with “I stole this for you, here, take it”?

Gorsuch apparently has no problem with the technically allowable but unquestionably unethical R behavior that dropped this nomination in his lap.

Isn’t that a telling reflection on his personal philosophy of justice, or fairness, or equality?

Aren’t those primary qualities one would expect in a judge?

Isn’t that a very telling reflection on his basic character?

Receiving stolen property is wrong. No matter how much you want it. No matter how many of your friends want you to have it.

A man of probity? Seriously? I would expect a man of “strong moral principles; honesty and decency” to say, “This is wrong. I can’t accept this under these circumstances.”

Conservative Christians talk a good game about standing all alone against the world when they have to. Why is it that they make such a big deal out of doing that when the outcome is hurting other people, but they are much slower to make that righteous stand when it means giving up something they want for themselves?

Lent begins on Wednesday, and if Judge Gorsuch goes to church on Sunday he will hear this:

The devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him a Supreme Court appointment with lifetime tenure and enormous power to do great harm in the lives of vulnerable women, immigrants, and black voters for decades to come, and he said to him, “All these I will give you, if you will just hold your nose and close your eyes and play along with unscrupulous party politics.”

Okay he won’t hear that, but I wish he would. I wish he would hear the real appointed passage for Sunday and see his own current temptation reflected in it. Is this how he wants to go down in history? As the man of ostensibly sterling character who nevertheless blithely abandoned all principles of basic fairness for personal and political gain? Whoever ends up in that seat is going to have the same asterisk next to his name as the current occupant of the Oval Office. There’s too much sleaze involved with the way he got the job. And he will never be able to live that down.