Of course the US has left the UN Human Rights Council, because if anything, it’s bad optics for Nikki Haley’s 2020 ambitions, as Trump stokes the flames of demographic and racial panic among his low-information base.
www.independent.co.uk/...
The UN condemnation comes just days after the United States withdrew its membership from the Human Rights Council, saying that the council is against Israel.
"For too long, the Human Rights Council has been a protector of human rights abusers, and a cesspool of political bias," Nikki Haley, the US ambassador to the UN, said Tuesday during a speech at the State Department in Washington. She continued to say that the US had withdrawn from the council to reaffirm America's commitment to human rights, which she said "does not allow us to remain a part of a hypocritical and self-serving organisation that makes a mockery of human rights".
The vast majority of immigrants arriving in the US and facing potential separation are coming from turbulent countries like Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras. In those countries, high violent crime rates and difficult economic conditions have forced families to leave, migrating north to the US and elsewhere.
www.independent.co.uk/...
- Since 2005's McCain-Kennedy legislation, the basic approach to comprehensive immigration reform has been the same: you need to be *tough* on the border, assure people there is a rigorous and orderly process and then people will accept legalization for the undocumented.
- This was the same general structure of the Gang of Eight immigration bill in the Senate in 2013. And it makes a lot of sense: there's strong majority support for this approach in poll after poll.
- In fact that bill passed the senate 68-32!
-
But.
- Both those pieces of legislation were killed by hard-right, restrictionist mobilization against it. The plain fact of immigration politics in this country is that the Steve King/Stephen Miller wing of the GOP, a small minority of the country, has a total veto on it.
- Now what *has* happened during the last 13 years is that unauthorized immigration has fallen significantly, net migration from Mexico has reached zero, and funding and manpower at the border has doubled. There have never been more border patrol and more ICE agents.
- Deportations in the first term of Obama hit record highs. In short, The border has never been more patrolled and militarized.
- And yet somehow the anti-immigration forces during this time have only gotten stronger and more extreme.
- That's because the politics of opposition aren't driven by concerns about border security or lawfulness. There *are* lots of persuadable *voters* who do have those concerns. But they're not the obstacle.
-
No, the hardcore opposition is driven by demographic and racial panic.
- The leaders of that wing, Steve King for instance, are very open and clear about their opposition to demographic change. Steve Bannon even pointed to having too many Asian tech CEO's as an example of the problem he's trying to solve.
- The president himself lamented immigration from Haiti because it is a shithole country and openly pined for more people from countries like Norway.
- They are not subtle about this.
- And that is why no amount of border security or enforcement ***will ever be enough*** to assuage their opposition.
- The only political solution is for the pro-immigration faction, which is closer to the majority's views on the topic, to organize sufficiently to deal Steve King et al total defeat. That's what happened in California after Prop 187. I see no other way out.
Is there a GoFundMe for drive-by Mariachi bands:
Comments are closed on this story.