Do you think Mueller had the goods on Trump and Putin conspiring to rig the election but that he didn’ t have enough proof to make the case?
Do you think he had enough had it been anyone else but Trump (using the usual prosecutorial discretion) he’d have convened a grand jury to ask for an indictment, but William Barr in an attempt to protect the president watered down this in his letter?
Monday, Mar 25, 2019 · 4:46:49 PM +00:00
·
HalBrown
Greg Sergeant in The Washington Post reminds up that even if Mueller didn’t prove a criminal conspiracy these three things are true:
- Donald Trump got elected president in part due to a massive foreign attack on our democracy.
- Even if Trump’s campaign didn’t collude with that act in a criminally chargeable manner, he committed extraordinary abuses of power to try to prevent a full accounting of that attack on our democracy from taking place.
- Trump’s attorney general is in the process of preventing a real public airing of the full dimensions of both of the above points.