But they haven't. They seem entirely comfortable with the current arrangement, whereby Trump lies to them nonstop and they obediently type up the “falsehoods." Here's the dirty little secret that likely drives a lot of the pointless Trump rally coverage: The events provide media outlets with lots of content—but not news, and there's a big difference. He's staged more than 50 rallies since 2017 and they're all virtually identical, which by definition means they're not news.
Again, it would be one thing if the press covered the rallies and used them as opportunities to forcefully drive home the narrative of the Trump presidency, which is he's a pathological liar who's virtually incapable of speaking a truthful sentence. But, of course, that's not how the rallies are covered. Instead the rallies are covered as a mountain of "Trump said" dispatches, as reporters chronicle his claims while barely taking time to point out that, y'know, the claims aren't true. For full fact-checks of the rallies, news consumers often have to go to a second, sidebar report where the Trump "falsehoods" from the rallies are detailed. The whole process is a complete mess and it reflects media timidity in the age of Trump. And it all stems from a collective fear of calling the bully a liar.
CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale recently stressed how out of whack the rally coverage is, in that most of it just completely glosses over the lies that fuel the events. "I can't tell you the number of times I've fact-checked a Trump rally where he's made 15, 20, 25, sometimes even 30 false claims and then I'll go read the coverage of the rally," said Dale. “And not only is that not the focus, it's not even mentioned."
Indeed, an NBC report this week on the North Carolina rally casually mentioned "Trump trailed off-topic at times" during the event. What the NBC dispatch never mentioned was that Trump unfurled nearly two dozen lies during the event. It's part of the problematic normalizing that the press has done for Trump over the last two years.
Perhaps even more egregious this week was The New York Times’ decision to use the North Carolina rally as the backdrop for the newspaper's umpteenth friendly look at Trump loyalists. I'm not sure why “Trump supporters support Trump” is considered news in 2019, but apparently the Times is convinced it's a thing. So a reporter was dispatched to dutifully chronicle how Trump fans at the North Carolina event really, really like Trump. And of course, Trump's blatant racism was watered down and became merely "identity politics." Why? Because if Trump's swimming in racist rhetoric (which he does), that means his supporters are also racist, and that ruins the Times' preferred narrative that they're really just good folks who are so often overlooked. (Reminder: The Times couldn't care less about hardcore Obama supporters three years into his term.)
"Many of Mr. Trump’s rally-going supporters said the outings were equally defined by the carnival-like atmosphere that greets attendees even before Mr. Trump speaks," the Times stressed. "It’s in the hours before the rally, in the lines for refreshments and sunscreen and knockoff Make America Great Again merchandise, where Mr. Trump’s crowds are ripened for the coming spectacle."
Well, least the Times made sure to note that everyone was having fun at Trump's rally. The fact that it was filled with vindictive lies was dutifully brushed aside.
Eric Boehlert is a veteran progressive writer and media analyst, formerly with Media Matters and Salon. He is the author of Lapdogs: How the Press Rolled Over for Bush and Bloggers on the Bus. You can follow him on Twitter @EricBoehlert.
This post was written and reported through our Daily Kos freelance program.
Comments are closed on this story.