The unanimous ruling was further evidence that claims of religious liberty almost always prevail in the current court.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously ruled that Philadelphia may not bar a Catholic agency that refused to work with same-sex couples from screening potential foster parents.
What they mean by screening
If you are LGBT then it’s a no go from the get go.
SCOTUS: Unanimously supported discrimination based on religious dogma.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for six members of the court, said that since the city allowed exceptions to its policies for some other agencies it must also do so in this instance. The Catholic agency, he wrote, “seeks only an accommodation that will allow it to continue serving the children of Philadelphia in a manner consistent with its religious beliefs; it does not seek to impose those beliefs on anyone else.”
So any bigotry that can claim religious justification is just fine and dandy, then?
I’m not imposing my religious beliefs on you, I am only protecting mine.
Ugh.
I am only burning you at the stake, not trying to convert you witch!
What next, using the menacing threat “this is a Christian country”, as in, convert or get out you bunch of heathens?
How about protecting the State from religion?
That bit is always forgotten
SCOTUS 5 6 Catholics plus 1 ex catholic? [cool]