If you think there’s a limit to what white supremacists will go to hold down Black Americans, you’re wrong. The latest effort comes from an anti-affirmative action group that’s challenging Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) over the role race plays in their admissions for prospective students.
The nonprofit Students for Fair Admissions, comprising 20,000 students, parents, and others, its website reads, essentially objects to the landmark decision by the Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling in 1954—the one that reversed course on the infamous “separate but equal” clause in the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case.
Students for Fair Admissions, the plaintiffs in the newly challenged Supreme Court case, demand that UNC and Harvard be “colorblind” in their admissions decisions, USA TODAY reports. The case is headed to the Supreme Court, where Donald Trump and the Federalist Society’s work at packing the highest court in the land will give white supremacists yet another chance to dismantle decades of hard-won progress for Black and other students of color.
RELATED STORY: Good sign for Abrams, Warnock as Georgia’s Black voters turn out in record numbers for early voting
Campaign Action
Quoting a Supreme Court brief from 2007 that challenged school districts’ race-conscious attendance policy under the Equal Protection Clause under the 14th Amendment, the group highlighted that "no state has any authority … to use race as a factor in affording educational opportunities among its citizens."
But the difference between what Brown established and what the plaintiffs are challenging today is vast. Brown found that segregated schools were inherently different from those available to white students, and that Black children weren’t been treated the same as their white counterparts. Also, what the plaintiffs are challenging is antithetical to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which expands protections for citizens granted by the Bill of Rights, specifically Black Americans, after the abolition of slavery and the end of the Civil War.
A brief from Harvard this summer to the Supreme Court said: "No equivalence can sincerely be drawn between the segregation Brown rightly condemned and a university’s limited consideration of race … to assemble a diverse class.”
USA TODAY reports that arguments for the cases against Harvard and UNC are set to take place on Oct. 31. UNC is a public university, and therefore the case directly applies to the 14th Amendment. Harvard challenges Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which reads that “No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
David Hinojosa, an attorney with the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, will argue at the high court on behalf of a number of students and alumni at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Hinojosa told USA TODAY, “Brown never said that the equal protection clause is colorblind. […] It was a categorical exclusion of Black children from all-white schools, and that has nothing to do with race-conscious admissions."
The Students for Fair Admissions argues that the 14th Amendment was never designed to give preference to anyone based on race, and that admissions decisions at Harvard somehow exclude Asian American students and give Black students an unfair advantage. This view, sadly, is supported by current conservative members of the high court and is a frequent talking point of far-right commentators who allege that Democratic policies are racist.
"Race-based government measures during the 1860s and 1870s to remedy state-enforced slavery were therefore not inconsistent with the color-blind Constitution," Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the 2007 decision.
Although Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recused herself from the Harvard suit because she previously served on the university’s board of overseers, she will hear the UNC case. But during oral arguments, USA TODAY reports, Jackson unequivocally denied the idea that the 14th Amendment meant a colorblind Constitution.
"I don't think that the historical record establishes that the founders believed that race neutrality or race blindness was required," Jackson said.
You can listen to Justice Brown’s full comments on the 14th Amendment here:
Want to fight back against right-wing judges? We need a Democratic Senate to confirm rational people to federal courts. Donate $1 to each of these Dems running to flip GOP seats from red to blue.
The midterm elections are only 20 days away, and there are MANY ways you can get out the Democratic vote. Check them all out at our Daily Kos GOTV page, and plug into the activity that matches your preferences & skillset.