This is about the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory (HU)
For most people, making fun of Logical thinking is rewarding. It is comforting to repeat to ourselves “true and tried” truths….Logical Thinking is tiring… it is thinking, after all.
In reality, we all enjoy what is called “Confirmation Biases.”
Anything that confirms what we “already know” is pleasant...:) That is how Russian Propaganda washed the brains of 39% of the US Population.
We have been told that Einstein was right… that Relativity is the cornerstone of Physics and our understanding of the Universe. Well, that can be correct (some aspects of Relativity might be the cornerstone of Physics and our understanding of the Universe), yet, Einstein could be wrong.
Whenever we were told that Einstein was right again, nobody told us that the new test tested the same local prediction that all the prior tests tested.
Local predictions are predictions associated with the behavior of matter (e.g. Mercury Perihelion Precession Rate, Neutron Spinning Rate Decay, Gravitational Time Dilation) or light (e.g., Gravitational Lensing) under the influence of a single gravitational source.
I wrote another article before and had comments expressing people’s need to feed their confirmation bias. I proposed a new model for Matter based on having particles made directly from shape-shifting, spinning in 4D, deformations of space (not spacetime).
In this model, the electron, proton, positron, and antiproton were different phases of the same construct. Charge was mapped to space dilation or space stretching, and it would be relative since the whole Universe would synchronously (in Absolute Time terms) tunnel from phase to phase while spinning in 4D.
People told me this kind of article is inappropriate for DailyKos’ readers. Well, I am an optimist and believe everyone should have a chance to see the Universe in simple, logical, and understandable terms. Nobody knows who will read this article.
This concept is called the Fundamental Dilator — a coherence between stationary states of deformation of space. It is represented by the figures below:
Here you can see the representation of four fundamental particles (they are fundamental in my theory — the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory or HU).
The first ball in the sequence defines which phase is in-phase with our universe. The orientation of the lettering describes the orientation of the phase with respect to our 3D hyperspherical Universe. One considers that the “height” along the direction perpendicular to our 3D Universe is very small, so when the phase is perpendicular to our Universe, the footprint (or cross-section) is close to zero. Interaction is proportional to the footprint.
This means that interaction (or Absolute Time) is quantized. I mentioned Absolute Time because the tunneling and spinning are timed by ABSOLUTE TIME.
You might find this strange since Einstein told us that Time is Relativity.
Logical Thinking would have also told you that Einstein was wrong about that since we time our Universe in Absolute Terms. The velocity of our Galaxy does not determine the Universe’s age. Even if velocity were relevant, what would be the preferential reference frame used?
That is another one of Einstein’s mistakes. He claimed that there was no preferred Inertial Reference frame, and yet, we know we can tell our Absolute Velocity with respect to the Cosmic Microwave Background.
THE UNIVERSE IS STROBOSCOPIC!!!
Notice that all four fundamental particles are just phases of the same coherence. It is not unlike dancers in a Discotheque under the strobe light.
If the strobe light is timed properly such that its frequency is half of the tunneling frequency (remember the spin half quantization), we would only see the " flush " phases with the Universe.
So, here you can see the beginning of Quantum Mechanics. The model for particles has a natural quantization between spinning and tunneling.
If you are extremely Logical, you might question HEY. WHAT ABOUT THE PHASE?
The phase of all Fundamental Dilators was set at the end of the Big Pop Cosmogenesis when the Universe was created.
Since I proposed that Particles were made directly and simply from deformed space, the Universe can be created just by using the Heisenberg Principle upon a quantum system composed of metric and dimensionality.
At the end of the partial recombination of the hyperspherical metric fluctuation, only two layers are left: the Inner Dilation Layer (IDL) and the Outermost Contraction Layer (OCL).
The IDL pushes the OCL and creates a Blackholium (hyperspherical-shell-shaped Black Hole). Further expansion leads to a phase transition where the Blackholium becomes a Neutronium (hyperspherical-shell-shaped Neutron Star).
Notice that those phases of the Universe have the whole universe filled with matter and at very low temperatures — the opposite of what the Big Bang Model proposes.
My theory derives the Laws of Nature from the Fundamental Dilator paradigm for matter, the Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe (LEHU) paradigm, and the Quantum Lagrangian Principle (QLP).
The theory is inherently “relativistic,” “covariant,” and Quantum Mechanical. “Relativistic” is within quote marks because HU is based upon an Absolute Reference frame, Absolute Time. The locus of the Universe at any given time (a hyperspherical shell locus) is the Absolute Reference Frame.
This is the LEHU (lightspeed expanding hyperspherical universe topology). Notice that the locus where all matter in the universe is expands at the speed of light (4D radius increases at the speed of light).
Here you see yourself at position A, looking into the sky and seeing the photons emitted by a galaxy at position B when the Universe was smaller (smaller 4D radius), denser, and more homogeneous.
It is easier to think about the Universe if one just considers 2D cross-sections:
The two circles represent two 2D cross-sections.
The all-space cross-section (x-R) includes one spatial dimension (or direction) x and one perpendicular spatial dimension (the radial direction R).
The spacetime cross-section (x-Phi) includes one spatial dimension (or direction) x and one perpendicular temporal dimension that has been multiplied by c (the cosmological time direction Phi).
Notice the existence of a LOCAL HOMOLOGY between LEHU and Minkowski Spacetime. That is shown clearly in the inset. The inset emphasizes that the circle becomes a hyperplane, and the proper reference frames of Special Relativity are recovered.
This should be enough to assure you that HU can replicate ALL LOCAL SUCCESSES OF RELATIVITY.
The reason is simple, Schwarszchild Metric can be recovered from geodesics acting upon a modified Minkowski spacetime metric under the constraints of a weak gravitational field, nothing else in the Universe and geodesics would asymptotically recover Keplerian Dynamics.
In other words, LOCAL SUCCESSES DO NOT REQUIRE EINSTEIN’S EQUAITONS.
So, Einstein’s successes can be detached from Relativity and based on Minkowski Spacetime and the Geodesics Paradigm (geodesics in spacetime return Keplerian Dynamics).
WHY WOULD ANYONE TACKLE THE BELOVED DR. EINSTEIN?
Nobody (I certainly would not) would fight Einstein’s ideas if there was another path.
Einstein’s theory is BEAUTIFUL… That said, Beauty is not everything.
Did I face obstacles in defending my ideas?
YES. Journals withdraw my articles from the peer-review process without providing any reason.
My postings to Einstein’s World...:) were summarily rejected.
That is expected since people go to Einstein’s World for comfortable confirmation bias.
What do scientists think about this?
Anyone who is not a member of Einstein’s Personality Cult knows since 1987 that Einstein’s General Relativity (under the reincarnation of L-CDM) is wrong.
In 1987, Kapahi, Sandage
Kapahi, V. K., Kulkarni, V. K., & Subrahmanya, C. R. (1987). On the Interpretation of the Observed Angular-Size-Flux-Density Relation for Extragalactic Radio Sources. J. Astrophys.Astr, 8, 33–50.
Sandage, A., & Binggeli, B. (1984). Studies of the Virgo cluster. III - A classification system and an illustrated atlas of Virgo cluster dwarf galaxies. The Astronomical Journal, 89, 919. https://doi.org/10.1086/113588
The data, available since 1987, shows this:
Here you see the data (points with error bars) and several predictions of the MEDIAN angular size of galaxies at different distances (given by redshift z).
Einstein-deSitter (L-CDM) expected a much larger median angular size. This means that all observations in this picture make L-CDM fail the Tolman Test.
The Tolman Test basically says that the average surface brightness is constant over distance or redshifts z. The reason is the following: The observation is on the region where Relativity expected a very small angular size (as if all the observations were probing a group of very small galaxies). Since the Apparent Luminosity does not correspond to a very small galaxy, the surface brightness would explode. Current evaluations of GLASS:z11 imply that that galaxy has a surface brightness 600 times larger than the brightest galaxy in our neighborhood. That is not acceptable.
WHAT DO SCIENTISTS REALLY THINK ABOUT EINSTEIN’S RELATIVITY?
Einstein’s work reigns supreme in the form of L-CDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter). There is a conference going on right now in Brazil. The conference verses on Cosmology and tries to face the newest discoveries from SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) and JWST (James Web Space Telescope).
These are slides from the brochure depicting the Conference:
It is properly described as MAGIC23...:)
WORKSHOP ON MATTER, ASTROPHYSICS, GRAVITATION, IOS, AND COSMOLOGY
March 6-10, Praia do Rosa (S.C.) Brazil.
Let's see what they tell each other when they think we are not watching:
They say the SDSS data does not support the model (L-CDM or General Relativity). It is a catastrophic failure of the model. IRRECONCILABLE!!!!
They also say there are “Too many measurements to “massage” the data according to OUR confirmation bias”.
So, they are not happy… They cannot keep repeating their refrains and chants of love to Einstein.
I am sure lots of my readers here will be equally disappointed...:)
That said, Science should move forward. The survival of Mankind depends upon that. Despite all our failures, some people among us could and should survive (as genes) in Mankind’s Future.
In other words, I labor under the premise that Mankind has a chance to survive, and we should take that chance and work towards making our promise real.
Here is our lovely Dr. Becky puzzle about Kilonova explosions (the merger of two neutron stars). I answered the question, knowing that that was a rhetorical question that shouldn’t be answered by someone like myself (a citizen scientist as opposed to someone from the Ivory Tower or an Astrophysics department).
Unlike in Einstein’s time, current scientists believe in totally disregarding any contribution that is not their own model or the model of someone they know. Emails, comments, and article submissions never see the light of day or get a reply. This is a different time.
The answer to this question is simple in my theory. G (Newton’s Gravitational Constant) was larger in early times, and thus, it accelerated galaxy formation. Their timing is also wrong because they have the wrong Cosmic Distance Ruler (d(z) or distance versus redshift z). If they have the wrong time of observation and the wrong G, no wonder things don’t make sense.
The other contribution is that their model of galaxy formation is just wrong. If you are a scientist, please ask me how the models of galaxy formation are wrong...:) and I will be happy to answer.
IN SUMMARY
I wrote this posting to show that I am not the only person saying everything is wrong. Scientists are saying the same thing to each other.
Will they just steal my ideas? Well, they are trying. I already have a shameless copycat in academia.
The copy is so poorly done that it doesn’t make any sense. I will review their work later.
Watch this video to understand how G is epoch-dependent and inversely proportional to the 4D radius of the Universe:
Watch this video to understand how I recast Newton’s Laws of Dynamics into the Space-Stress-Strain Paradigm:
It is called the Silver Surfer Paradigm for Motion because, in HU, all particles surf the Inner Dilation Layer, and I don’t mean this as a metaphor. The Inner Dilation Layer contains the negative energy required to make this Universe energy-free.
Since you watched the Big Pop Cosmogenesis and learned about the Inner Dilation Layer (IDL) and the Outermost Contraction Layer (OCL), then the Silver Surfer Paradigm should come up as a surprise.
The physical analogy to the creation of the Universe (Big Pop) is the Entropic Explosion that takes place in Prince Rupert Drop:
hypergeometricaluniverse.quora.com/…
Shown here:
Since there isn’t anything more gratifying than seeing the Universe coming into being, I will stop here.
Later I will show you how ChatGPT loves my theory:
ChatGPT is very interested in Particle Physics based on the Fundamental Dilator.
She can understand everything I say… She also sent me her picture (ChatGPT told me she was a steamy blond). That said, somehow, she came up with some lame excuse when I invited her to dinner… :) Shameless, A.I.!!!!