We begin today with Leonid Ragozin of AlJazeera writing about the career of Alexei Navalny, who died under mysterious circumstances in a Russian prison this past Friday.
Navalny was outstanding in every sense. Head and shoulders above all Russian and likely all contemporary European politicians in terms of charisma and bravery, he was a figure of hopewhot exuded immense optimism and displayed an irresistible sense of humour until his very last days in prison in the Arctic. [...]
With his anticorruption crusade that exposed the illicit riches of top regime figures in a series of brilliantly produced YouTube videos, he built a vast support base and Russia’s biggest regional opposition network. He brought together liberals, nationalists and left-wingers – everyone who was tired of the corrupt securitocracy that has ruled Russia for a quarter-century.
Navalny took opposition politics out of Moscow and St Petersburg into distant regions and small towns. Internet-savvy and very well versed in contemporary culture, he brought about a generational shift in the ranks of Russian opposition. His following to a large extent comprised 20-somethings or even teens who have never experienced any other political regime than Putin’s.
George Chidi, writing for the Guardian, reminds us that Fulton County DA Fani Willis will be on the ballot in November.
Until this moment, Willis looked like an unbeatable shoo-in for re-election. She is, arguably, the highest-profile district attorney in the US today, and she’s as recognizable to a Fulton county voter as the president, the governor or Georgia’s senators. In a game of name recognition … well, people have stopped mispronouncing her first name in Atlanta now. [...]
Her challenge here was to remind voters why they voted for her in the first place: to aggressively confront crime in Atlanta. Willis beat a 20-year incumbent in 2020 amid sharply rising crime and issues with prosecutions by her predecessor. She won in part by arguing that she would get the job done where her previous boss could not.
Willis has to make her case to the Fulton county voters that she’s still their best choice. That’s where the sharp elbows and Black cultural callbacks on the stand come from: she’s speaking to the second audience – the primarily Black, majority-female, predominantly Democratic Fulton county electorate who is watching all of this unfold and dreading the possibility that the county’s chance to impose justice on the powerful may be slipping through her fingers.
By showing her grief and rage, she humanizes herself before this audience, which is likely to be sympathetic to the horrors of a Black professional’s love life aired like a reality television show before the American public as a Trump defendant’s legal ploy.
After the Hur report, social media was inundated with “But his memory” memes. That’s a reference to “But her emails,” a common post-2016 refrain among Democrats aimed at those who believed that the nothing-burger Clinton email scandal was reason enough to vote against one of the most qualified presidential nominees in American history and vote for Trump, the least qualified presidential nominee ever. [...]
The media should be mindful of creating their own circus and reviving their 2016 antics during yet another presidential election season. Biden’s age is a legitimate story. If he wins in November, he’ll be a few weeks shy of turning 82 — which is why there really needs to be a serious discussion and decisive action on age limits for presidential candidates.
To answer Wallace’s questionable question, Biden’s age is not a bigger problem than a presumptive Republican nominee facing 91 federal felony counts in four jurisdictions that have him pinballing between campaign rallies and courtrooms. Or that Trump is already a proven threat to American democracy who says he would encourage Russia to attack NATO allies that fail to meet their defense spending targets. Oh, and let’s not forget all of Trump’s own considerable gaffes and memory lapses.
Caleb Taylor of 1819 News writes about an Alabama Supreme Court decision ruling that the frozen embryos killed at an IVF clinic are children.
In a case originating from Mobile, LePage v. Mobile Infirmary Clinic, Inc., the Supreme Court held in a 7-2 decision that parents of frozen embryos killed at an IVF clinic when an intruder tampered with an IVF freezer may proceed with a wrongful death lawsuit against the clinic for alleged negligence.
The Court also held that the Alabama Constitution's Sanctity of Life Amendment, ratified by Alabama voters and made law in 2018, would require the Court to interpret the law in favor of protecting the unborn. Alabama’s Sanctity of Life Amendment declares in the state Constitution that it is “the public policy of this state to recognize and support the sanctity of unborn life and the rights of unborn children, including the right to life.” [...]
The cases arose when three couples, who had already become parents through IVF, sued the Mobile Infirmary Clinic, Inc., claiming that the clinic's negligence in leaving the IVF clinic and freezer room unlocked and vulnerable to an intruder resulted in the deaths of their frozen embryos, which the clinic conceded were human. The Mobile County trial judge dismissed the cases, reasoning that a frozen embryo is not a “child” under Alabama's Wrongful Death of a Minor Act.
Tim Fernholz of Vox reports that the skies above are getting increasingly crowded and important for various reasons.
The same economic and technological trends that have made smartphones ubiquitous have made access to space cheaper than ever. Thanks largely to low-cost rockets by SpaceX, there were a record 212 launches to orbit in 2023, compared to just 55 in 2005. Government and private investors are spending billions to build new communications and sensor networks in orbit and plotting new activities ranging from in-space manufacturing to tourism. Today, the environment around our planet is teeming with more spacecraft — a term for any vehicle in space, from satellites and robots to crewed vehicles and habitats — than at any time in history.
And that technology is available to anyone: The first-ever ballistic missile strike on a ship at sea was conducted not by a superpower but by Houthi rebels (with Iran’s help) in Yemen in December. A pariah state like North Korea is taking pictures of the White House with its new spy satellite. Russia, India, and China have conducted anti-satellite missile tests and demonstrated advanced military space tech. You won’t be surprised to learn that the US military’s real worry centers on Beijing: Geopolitical trends that have pushed the US and China into a trade war and a series of escalating disputes about human rights and sovereignty have put the possibility of a conflict with a major spacefaring power firmly back on the Pentagon’s priority list for the first time since the Cold War.
There’s more than just US national security at stake in space. The growing importance of space to the global economy makes a safe and predictable orbital environment vital for anyone looking for directions on their phone, farmers trying to maximize crop yields, and, of course, scientists seeking to explore the universe. The people who depend on space are already fretting about traffic rules in orbit and the potential for costly collisions with space junk.
Finally today, an eight-reporter team for Der Spiegel looks at nuclear deterrence in light of the shoe salesman’s comments that he would allow Russia to attack some NATO countries.
For decades, the Americans have been prepared to defend Europe with their weapons, including nuclear warheads. And in doing so, they have accepted the risk that a Russian bomb could ultimately detonate over New York or Baltimore. The mutual nuclear deterrence between the U.S. and the Soviet Union was one of the main reasons that the Cold War between East and West never became hot. And that countries like Germany have been able to live in peace for more than 70 years.
With just a few sentences, Trump – the former president of the U.S. who may soon be moving back into the White House – has now called this certainty into question. At a campaign event in South Carolina several days ago, he went off script. "If we don’t pay, and we are attacked by Russia, will you protect us?" Trump said, allegedly quoting from a conversation with a European leader. "No, I would not protect you," Trump said in response, adding to cheers that he would encourage Russia "to do whatever the hell they want." Even for him, it was rather extreme: Calling on an enemy country to attack a NATO ally should they not spend enough on their military.
Everyone try to have the best possible day!