Politico.com has obtained a leaked copy of Michele Bachmann's "Declaration of Health Care Independence" , a petition signed by herself and supporters and she plans to "unveil" it tomorrow before President Obama's State of the Union speech.

As usual for Bachmann, it's all about style, with absolutely no substance...kinda like the inside of her head. Just a lot of empty rhetoric and wide open spaces.

It's time for Michele Bachmann to get redistricted out of Congress. It's enough that we have crooks and liars in congress, we don't need anybody there who is also certifiably psycho.

Embargoed copy of Bachmann's hilarious declaration from Politico.com:

The preamble: "In order to retain the Blessings of Liberty as secured to us by our Founding Fathers and as expressed in our Constitution, We the People reject the imposition upon us of a new, Washington-controlled system of government-run health care. We demand Constitutional protection of the right to make our own health decisions and our own health care choices free of government denials, bureaucratic red-tape, and greater intergenerational debt."

A Washington takeover of American health care will

  1. Deny fundamental personal and economic liberties and indisputably violate the Principle of Limited Government as established by the Constitution;
  1. Impose increased costs and taxes upon individuals, families, and businesses, as well as taxpayers at the federal, state, and local levels;
  1. Irreparably cripple the American economy, at the cost of jobs, businesses, productivity, and quality of life;
  1. Create an inescapable new tax by imposing individual and employer mandates;
  1. Institutionalize a massive, ever-expanding federal bureaucracy that is impersonal and impractical;
  1. Empower bureaucrats to interfere in the doctor-patient relationship, undermine the quality of care, limit choice, and increase the cost of health care.

We have appealed to the decency of the elected majority to respect the rights of all Americans, but their leaders have been deaf to the Voice of the People. We are appalled by their cavalier disregard of the Constitution and of the demands of the People. We are repulsed by their blatant political bribes and kickbacks.
We, therefore, the People and Representatives of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, do solemnly Publish and Declare that health care reform, as a matter of principle must

  1. Protect as inviolate the vital doctor-patient relationship;
  1. Reject any addition to the crushing national debt heaped upon all Americans;
  1. Improve, rather than diminish, the quality of care that Americans enjoy;
  1. Be negotiated publically, transparently, with genuine accountability and oversight, and be free from political favoritism;
  1. Treat private citizens at least as well as political officials;
  1. Protect taxpayers from compulsory funding of abortion;
  1. Reject all new mandates on patients, employers, individuals, or states;
  1. Prohibit expansion of taxpayer funded health care to those unlawfully present in the United States;

9) Guarantee Equal Protection under the law and the Constitution;

  1. Empower, rather than limit, an open and accessible marketplace of health care choice and opportunity.

As most of you may have already noticed, Bachmann basically plagiarized the last 1 thru10 "declarations" from the already existing language from the current health care reform package. These "declarations"... "that it will help, not hurt people. That it "be paid for". . that it "not directly fund abortion"... that it have "genuine accountability and oversight"....not one of these ideas are new, and are already accounted for in existing legislation. Obviously, Michele Bachmann is trying to get credit for a health care bill that she didn't write and doesn't really support. It's Bachmann's world of lunacy. Obviously, she feels that there are enough stupid Tea Baggers out there who will hoist her on a pedestal. Id rather hoist the loon on her own petard and watch her fall.

Because it glaringly stands out, I wonder if Bachmann's "declaration" 9  applies to gay couples married in one state and denied "recognized" married status in another?  As I said, watch her fall on her own petard!