Yes in the twisted world of Rand Paul while he gets richer your wages should fall. Now, he has a snappy new plan to cut spending in half, and as a added bonus keep his fellow rich folks from paying their fair share, all while robbing our veterans of care, denying children an education, ending aid to our family farmers, and stealing the Social Security of young folks. Yes, it is called the Rand Paul "Spend What You Have Plan":

PAUL: I can't imagine voting to raise the debt ceiling. I would only consider it if we attached a balanced budget rule to it, or if we attached significant spending cuts. So I can't imagine voting for it 'cause year after year we vote to raise the debt ceiling, but no one ever restrains spending....

But here's my point. They make it out to be a Hobson's choice. You either do it or the government shuts down. What about, we don't raise the debt ceiling and we just spend what comes in? I call it the Spend What You Have plan. We bring in $200 billion every month up here. Over two trillion a year comes in. Why can't we just spend two trillion instead of spending four trillion? Just spend what comes in!

http://politicalcorrection.org/...

So, where to start Ayn?? Lets hear this plans in detail so every Kentuckian, a state that gets much more money out of the federal government than it puts in will know exactly what your election will cost them. Do you not owe us that??

I mean, yourself, Mitch McConnell, and all the greediest and least patriotic among us you whore for have already put billions back into your own pockets in a time of "War" and an economic crash and ensuing recession spawned by the disgraced policies you spew like gospel:

Back in March 2010, the CBO projected federal revenues of $2.673 trillion for FY 2011. The lame-duck deal that extended Bush's tax cuts through 2012 shaved $337 billion off of the 2011 revenue projection, meaning the government's now expecting to take in about $2.336 trillion for the year. A simple baseline 2011 budget, one that does not grant White House budget requests, would spend $3.728 trillion. Under Rand Paul's Spend What You Have Plan, we just need to slice almost one-and-a-half trillion dollars by springtime.

Will you stand up like a man and demand the end of the misled wars in the middle-east and really cut defense spending or just rob our veterans of their care:

Paul is one of those rare Republicans willing to cut defense spending, but he doesn't get specific there either. The OMB baseline for 2011 would spend $846 billion on defense and security programs, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Underfunding discretionary programs like the Veterans Health Administration is a GOP tradition, but even that critical budget item is about $45 billion a year — peanuts compared to the demands of the Spend What You Have Plan.

Yes, like a typical Republican hypocrite coward you will end up slashing funds for the care of our veterans you simply lack the guts to tell them that just like your newest soulmate Mitch McConnell. To be so against gay marriage you two will be spending a lot of "quality" time together...

And of course the elderly vote. You are chomping at the bit to steal their Social Security and healthcare but you can't. Yes, that money will have to be saved later on when you steal the Social Security of every other generation a process that began with the tax cuts to the greediest and least patriotic among us:

Everyone knows entitlement spending is the big stuff. According to OMB, we're going to spend $730 billion on Social Security next year. Rand Paul wants to change Social Security for younger Americans, but he's adamant that "I oppose any cuts in benefits for seniors or those nearing retirement." Thus, the Spend What You Have Plan can't touch 2011 Social Security spending. Paul's proposal to raise Medicare deductibles is also supposedly aimed only at the young, so Medicare spending in 2011 would stay close to the projection: $492 billion. Paul has said contradictory things about Medicaid, but assuming that "we must keep our promises" to Medicaid patients as well as retirees, there's another $271 billion in mandatory 2011 spending. Sub-total for Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security? $1.493 trillion.

Ah, but it soon becomes clear. Without saying so or letting you know Rand Paul is a starve the beast Republican and he considers anyone less fortunate than him the beast. You are the problem and you should not benefit from your government one bit, only folks like Paul should:

Chuck in our defense budget ($846 billion), and you're already at $2.339 trillion. According to Spend What You Have, we've got literally nothing left to spend on everything else the government does — VA hospitals, roads, schools, children's insurance programs, food stamps, unemployment benefits, etc.

I have a great idea Ayn. Why don't we start saving money by slashing the salaries of the rich elitists in Congress and the Senate?? Why don't we cut off their healthcare since they are so determined to keep much of America from being able to afford it?? Why don't we level a tax penalty against any company that sends an American job overseas or against any product that is made in slave markets and shipped into America?? Why don't we end all Corporate Welfare or all of the billions of dollars our government gives big business to rape our economy??

Yes, Ayn Rand and the whole Republican Party and many of the Corporate Democrats have all kinds of plans for slashing spending. But the problem you see is that all of these plans entail YOU making all the sacrifice while they just slop at the government trough more and more and use their power to insure that they never sacrifice anything. In fact, they will make damn sure they just get to stuff their pockets more full as yours continue to empty.

So get ready America. Rand Paul and the zealot Corporate Republican Party, enabled by Corporate Democrats and evidently the President are ready to make you trim the fat while they live larger than ever. They just aren't going to tell you that.