You see a lot of heat (if relatively little light) shed over third trimester abortion. And polls find a fairly consistent (if declining) majority that agrees that first trimester abortions should be legal. But I rarely see any discussion of
second trimester abortions.
My position is that all abortions after the first trimester, except special cases as determined by a medical ethics review board, should be banned, just as they are in France (but the right to first trimester abortion should be guaranteed by constitutional amendment). This stance was recently derided here on DKos as having a "constituency of one". In light of that, I thought it very interesting that a recent Harris Poll found that while 60 percent of Americans favour legal abortion in the first trimester, 72% think second trimester abortion should be banned.
Let that sink in, and then consider the Democrats' dilemma, as outlined in...(continued below fold)
a must-read
TAP piece in December, but also just this week in an excellent
Nicholas Kristof column* in the New York Times:
"The Democratic Party commits seppuku in the heartland by coming across as indifferent to people's doubts about abortions or even as pro-abortion. A Times poll in January found that 61 percent of Americans favor tighter restrictions on abortion, or even a ban, while only 36 percent agree with the Democratic Party position backing current abortion law.
That doesn't mean that there's no middle ground on abortion. In fact, most of America is standing, conflicted, on middle ground. Many people are deeply uncomfortable with abortions, but they also don't want women or doctors going to prison, and they don't want teenage girls dying because of coat-hanger abortions.
What has been lethal for Democrats has not been their pro-choice position as such, but the perception that they don't even share public qualms about abortion."
Kristof is dead right: Democrats have to get a little more ambivalent about abortion or be way out of step with other Americans (and for that matter people around the world). But we Democrats have to deal with a lot of cranky one-issue prochoice "fundamentalists" who talk of bolting the party if there is the slightest retreat from the militant position they espouse. My fear is that they are going to be a millstone around our collective necks if we don't watch out. (The same is true, by the way, of the militants on the other side: if the "life begins at conception" crowd gets too visibly powerful, the GOP can't win national elections.)
*[There's also an interesting paragraph concerning Howard Dean in that column, but it's a little off topic for this diary so I'll leave it aside.]
