There has been tremendous activity on the Taitz front, and I know the Orly Taitz Soap Opera has its loyal fans, so let me contribute another installment to "As the Taitz World Turns."
It has truly devolved into a tawdry affair, with tit for tat exchanges in the media and in court. Meanwhile, Orly Taitz continues with her crusade against "Obama the Muslim" and works hard to drive the nails into her wrists as she puts herself on the cross in these filings.
You may recall that Lucas Smith, a self-described former "star witness" of Taitz's, filed an affidavit with Judge Carter in California alleging that Taitz asked him to perjure himself. He also described in sickening detail Taitz's alleged affair with her disbarred convicted legal assistant, Charles Edward Lincoln III. Taitz vigorously denied Smith's accusations, though she never specifically referred to the sexual ones.
In addition to Taitz's Obama harassment filings, she had apparently made filings to become attorney of record for at least three of Lincoln's mortgage cases, which bear suspicious resemblance to the crimes for which he was convicted in Texas. In two of the cases, however, Lincoln acknowledged signing on Taitz's behalf. The bank fighting Lincoln objected to bringing Taitz into the case, noting Judge Land's rulings, among other concerns. The court wrote Taitz asking her to show cause as to why she should be allowed to represent Lincoln.
Taitz responded by saying she never filed any such request.
I was shocked to see your second order to show cause, since I never filed Plaintiff's amended Motion to Substitute Counsel for Pro Se Litigants...
Shocked!! she says. Did Lincoln forge her signature? Will he get away with it?
Native Born Citizen affirms that the signature on the filing does not resemble Taitz's other signatures. Lincoln subsequently filed his own response to the order to show cause, admitting his deceit and revealing that, in this week's episode, Taitz and Lincoln had a falling out:
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. agreed to represent the Plaintiffs..Taitz did not provide 45 days for her withdrawal as specified in the letter of understanding drafted and executed at her own direction.
In his affidavit, Lincoln practically confesses to an affair, telling the court
For the past five months, I worked closely with Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire, and in fact formed a close-bond and intimate personal relationship of trust and special confidence with her; this relationship did not end well.
Dr. Taitz agreed and promised me, as part of our quid pro quo, that so long as I would support her unconditionally in her litigation to disprove the constitutional legitimacy of President Barack H. Obama, she would equally unconditionally represent me and act as my attorney in a number of mortgage redemption cases...
During the five months we were working together, I provided Dr. Orly Taitz with all the support I could...Dr. Taitz and I spent a great deal of time working together between May 30, 2009 and November 4, 2090, and indeed traveled throughout the United States together working mostly on the Obama eligibility question.
He admits to signing two court filings on her behalf. Will Lincoln be charged? Will he go to jail? What does Orly's husband think about the "intimate personal relationship"? Lincoln claims not much, dragging Yosef into the latest motion, which includes a few gems (errors not corrected):
Dr. Taitz is perfectly fluent in five languages but English is not one of them.
Dr. Taitz informed me that her husband, Yosef Taitz had threatened/instructed her that if she continued to work with me, and especially if she signed any contracts with me, that he would require her to sign away all of her rights in the family property and estate, a much harsher result that he could have achieved if she (Dr. Orly Taitz) had sought an ordinary judicial divorce from Mr. Yosef Taitz or if he had sought a divorce from her (especially in a community property state).
Dr. Orly Tatiz appears to me to be an obviously somewhat naive and unsophisticated victim of a seriously abusive domestic relationship with her husband.
On Wednesday night...Dr. Taitz called me by telephone informed me that she could never ever see me or speak with me or work with me again, that her husband had said terrible things to her.
According to posts at Politijab, Lincoln defended his disclosure of this personal information to the world on Taitz's Facebook Wall and professed his ongoing affection (no typos fixed) and challenges critics to a duel:
Affidavits are given under penalty of perjury and I take my oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth very seriously. I am not a "former aide" of Orly's---I am the author of (conservatively estimated) 96-98% of the papers filed in Barnett v. Obama after July 1, 2009. Do not insult me. Do not question my honor or integrity unless you want to do so in person and to my face.
I care deeply for Orly and she is the victim of severe domestic abuse at home. She is a brave but very unsophisticated woman who bit off way more than she can chew because of a deep conviction that she was right. She and I have a great deal in common in that we are willing to March into Hell for a Heavenly Cause. Except for trying to be a latter-day Jeanne d'Arc without armour, or Boadicea without the Druids, it is not Orly's fault. She is causing me grave injury, but she is innocent of anything but confusion of mind due to stress and abuse and a lifetime of pent-up frustration and unhappiness.
As for the impropriety of "airing dirty laundry", Orly is arranging one petty little inconvenience against me after another. She is, like a very old-fashioned and unsophisticated girl might do, "cat fighting" with me, i.e. fighting extremely dirty because she knows I am the only real friend she ever had, in the sense of "I see you for all your faults, appreciate all your virtues, and think highly of you and want only the best for you just the same."
PART II
Meanwhile, in Georgia...
As you likely know at this point, the day the $20,000 sanctions were due in Judge Land's Court, Taitz affirmed her refusal to pay the Atlanta judge:
"Absolutely not," Taitz said Thursday afternoon when asked whether she would pay. "I have filed an appeal. It was a complete abuse of power."
"He imposed those sanctions to silence me," Taitz said. "If judges start punishing attorneys, then we end up in a totalitarian regime. This can’t go on."
Can't you just imagine her here, clutching her hands to her bosom and using her best damsel in distress voice--"This can't go on!"
Snidely Whiplash--er Judge Land--noticed the money had not been paid and directed the US attorney to collect Dr. Taitz's debt.
PART III
Meanwhile, orders on eligibility lawsuits have been coming in at rapid pace, poking holes in Taitz's sinking ship. Berg's appeal was rejected by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals for lack of standing, with the court labeling the opinion "precedential" to prevent further similar filings in their jurisdiction.
In an Indiana case against the governor for certifying the state's vote tally for Obama, a court of appeals rejected the plaintiff's claims and went further, weighing the merits of the plaintiff's claims that Obama was not a natural born citizen because his father was born in Africa and one must have "two parents" to be a natural born citizen.
The court dug up an old SCOTUS case from 1898, in which the Supreme Court weighed in on whether a man born in the United States to Chinese-born non-citizen parents was a citizen at birth. Native Born Citizen presents key statements from the ruling, including this quote from the 1898 ruling:
All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England. We find no warrant for the opinion that this great principle of the common law has ever been changed in the United States. It has always obtained here with the same vigor, and subject only to the same exceptions, since as before the Revolution.
The appeals court used this ruling and others as evidence of a precedent for natural born citizenship that they said outweighs any reliance on the Law of Nations by de Vattell. They concluded that the 1898 SCOTUS ruling, which found the man of Chinese descent a citizen at birth, intended for natural born citizens to include any one born on US soil.
Taitz, confused and delusional, immediately filed notices to Judge Carter demanding that he take notice of these rulings, which only in her own warped mind help her case.
Will Judge Carter impose his own sanctions against the numerous ridiculous filings Taitz continues to pile up on his desk or will he be deterred for fear of receiving insults similar to the ones she has cast against Judge Land? (I doubt he will be.)
She tells Judge Carter that Land's sanctions "add insult to injury" and constitute a concerted attempt to silence her by putting her license at risk. She claims the ruling "became a lynching festival for pro Obama media thugs."
Will Orly escape the thugs? Or will they bring her down?
PART IV
To make matters worse for poor Dr. Taitz, she has a hearing in December for a speeding ticket that documented her as going in excess of 100 MPH (trying to flee the media thugs?). Taitz has several previous traffic violations, so this could lead to suspension of her driving license.
Sadly, the California Bar has not said anything about suspending her law license.
PART V
Finally, Taitz posted this essay on her Website, written by someone named Carl F. Worden. Has Taitz finally cracked? Is she going to become the leader of a revolutionary group of crackpots? (Key portions emphasized but no typing errors from original have been corrected.) I apologize for only presenting portions, but I wasn't sure how much would be considered "copyright infringement," and it was quite long.
IT IS WAY TOO LATE TO VOTE OR EXERCISE YOUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH
Carl F. Worden
November 11, 2009
I realize I could get arrested for this or be "disappeared", but somebody needs to write these words and get it over with: It is way too late to vote or exercise your right to free speech if the goal is to restore our government to its constitutional intent. We will have to resort to war and force of arms if that goal is to be realized, and I know that is something a lot of you don’t want to read, but unfortunately that is the only remaining option left to the American people unless, of course, they are willing to simply lay back and let this government continue to do what it will.
I’m sure most of my readers will be familiar with the inspiring words of the Declaration of Independence, but they cannot fully understand the bravery of the men who penned that sacred document unless they delve into the everyday life of the American Colonists. Signing the Declaration of Independence in that day was tantamount to placing a noose around one’s own neck to make it easier for the Red Coats to hang you. In addition, many of those who signed the Declaration of Independence knew they were placing their closest loved ones and their personal fortunes in jeopardy, yet they willingly did it. Why? Because unlike us present day fools, they knew when to say when and they did indeed suffer extreme hardship and loss of both loved ones and personal fortunes in the process. Believe me, they knew full well what they were getting into and they chose to do it anyway.
snip
"Don’t do it", today’s average American will counsel you. There are peaceful means the Founding Fathers and Framers left us, right? We can vote the bad ones out of office and we can tell everyone how we feel by writing a blog or a letter to the editor of the local paper, right? Yeah right, maybe 50 or so years ago that had an effect, but it is way too late now, and I will explain why.
President Bill Clinton is the worst traitor to the American people who ever existed in United States history, and he did it without firing a shot or by giving our enemies important state defense secrets. He did it by allowing the massive American and international corporations to take over the United States Government through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the General Agreement on Trades and Tariffs, otherwise known as GATT.
Once those free trade agreements were signed into law by Clinton, the United States was no longer governed by our Constitution — by default.
snip
Let’s look at how impotent a national election really is nowadays...It takes money to get a candidate elected, and corporate money is far more reliable than that of the average citizen or citizens’ group on the street, so any candidate can be sold via corporate influence and money to the local constituency. Years ago it was true that all politics is local, but at best, that only applies to a candidate looking to get elected the first time. After that first election, all politics is corporate, and you will soon understand why.
Now, what about that candidate voting for something his constituents will never forgive this year, like a "Public Option" health care reform bill? Isn’t that kind of betrayal something the voters can do something about next election? No, not anymore.
snip
But what about free speech; we still have that, don’t we? Yessiree, we sure do...and if you still think voting and free speech are a viable means of restoring the original intent of our Framers and the Constitution they created for us, then you are refusing to recognize the obvious because you know what it means to you and your loved ones if you do.
It means war.
snip
The Declaration of Independence is not a threatening or even inflammatory piece of writing at all. It is a detailed account of the history between the King of England and the Colonists, the problems that existed, the efforts to correct those problems and the conclusion that, since it takes two to Tango and your partner doesn’t want to dance, it’s time to send him home.
And that is my assessment of this current state of affairs.
snip
The only remaining question is this: Do we bother presenting our unconstitutional government with a Declaration of Independence of sorts, or do we just cut to the chase?
Carl F. Worden
How ironic if a lunatic from Russia (someone, ironically, none of these conservatives would have trusted in the McCarthy era) manages to convince deranged Americans to follow her and take up arms against their country because they are opposed to the results of the democratic process.
Stay tuned for next week's episode of "As the World of Taitz Turns" when we wait for Orly's response to Lincoln's filing and Facebook expose. Will she return to him or will she stay with the allegedly abusive Yosef? Will Yosef kick Orly to the curb to protect the family estate?
Will Orly's followers realize the level of her mental instability and abandon her to the media thugs?
Will her doppleganger show up and pretend to be Orly and attempt to ingratiate herself with Bill O'Reilly?
We can only watch in breathless anticipation.