The Senate Judiciary Committee today is having hearings regarding reauthorization of expiring provisions of the USA Patriot Act. Senator Franken was concerned with a provision about roving wiretaps and how the Patriot Act doesn’t require the government to name its target.
Here is a link to the article
To illustrate his concern, Franken, who stated he had recieved a copy of the Constitution when he was sworn in, read directly from it emphasizing this part:
“no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
“That’s pretty explicit language,” noted Franken, asking how the “roving wiretap” provision of the Patriot Act can meet that requirement if it doesn’t require the government to name its target.
The witness replied, "this is surreal,” apparently referring to having to respond to Franken’s question. “
What is surreal about answering a question about the Constitution?
The witness David Kris, assistant attorney general of the Justice Department’s National Security Division went on to say “I would defer to the other branch of government,” he said, referring to the courts
I was very proud of Senator Franken. It is awe inspiring to see someone ask hard questions and have real debates about these things. I do not regret a single cent I forwarded to his campaign over that long slog.
Update: KayCeSF Suggested helping retire Sen Frankens campaign debt if you feel so inclined. He is really doing a good job. Here is a link to his donation page.
Update 2: I understand it is considered gauche to say thanks for getting on the recc list so I'll just keep my gratefulness to myself.
