So not being happy with eliminating people who want to recall him from the pool of petition proof readers, Scottie and Co. have filed suit in Waukesha county saying that the GAB is breaking the law about it's position on Mickey Mouse.
That part at least is within the bounds of reasonable. Granted we have a system where your supporters challenge bogus signatures, but fine, I'll buy that.
It's bad enough that Fitz the Representative has put forth a bill making it illegal to signyour name more than once to a recall, while getting rid of the GAB that he and other state Republicans fought to put into place.
But then comes the equal protection thing. I'm fairly certain that wealthy white males aren't systematically discriminated against. Can't prove it, but I'm willing to take that on faith. So, from the first link, how can you possibly justify this:
The lawsuit says allowing multiple signatures is a violation of the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution because it harms the rights of those not signing.
No IANAL, but I passed Con Law, and I'm fairly certain something has to be legally COUNTED before an equal protection violation occurs. Maybe someone who is either a real lawyer or a lunatic can help me shed some light on this? Does voting for the winning side violate the equal protection rights of those who vote for the loser?
And is there a tag for "the stupid, it burns"?