Skip to main content

"Consider what American science might look like if all research were run like marijuana research is being run now. Suppose the Institute for Creation Science were put in charge of approving paleontology digs and the science of human evolution. Imagine what would happen to the environment if we gave coal and oil companies the power to block any climate research they didn’t like."
-John Henry Schwarz, Theoretical Physicist & Father of String Theory

    When it comes to marijuana research, the federal government is like having a teacher who hates you but who you've always really wanted to impress, because underneath it all you want their respect. You keep trying to find ways to prove how you're not a total failure and you do have some redeeming qualities. But whenever you have a project that will finally let you express your talents and positive qualities, the teacher refuses to grade it. That's medical marijuana research.

    Medical marijuana research is a classic catch 22. The FDA has no problem approving research proposals on the medicinal uses of marijuana, and for nearly every other drug known to man FDA approval is all you need in order to perform clinical studies. But marijuana research must also gain NIDA's approval in order to purchase NIDA's marijuana. NIDA alone can grow marijuana for FDA-approved clinical research, and NIDA unilaterally controls appropriations to researchers of the marijuana they grow. The problem is it's close to impossible to gain approval for medicinal research of marijuana from an agency whose legally established mission is to research how marijuana is the opposite of medicine, and in fact "highly abusive."

    NIDA has a monopoly on medical marijuana research, and they're the first to admit their bias. "As the National Institute on Drug Abuse, our focus is primarily on the negative consequences of marijuana use," a spokesperson told the New York Times in 2010. "We generally do not fund research focused on the potential beneficial medical effects of marijuana."

    Generally, as in almost never.

    Medical researchers are required to submit information on their clinical studies to By searching research on "marijuana" in the US, we find some telling information on how we research marijuana in the US.

    There are a total of 142 clinical studies on marijuana. Of those, 101 are sponsored by the federal government.

    Let's look at the 101 government studies first. There are a total of 5 clinical studies related to medical marijuana. Only one is actually studying whether marijuana has medicinal value. That study is researching medical marijuana and spinal injuries. The other 4 are tangentially related to medical marijuana, such as researching the pharmacology of how marijuana and opiates interact. Of the 5 studies, 3 of them are still in the "recruiting" phase, including the only one actually researching marijuana to treat a condition.

    That leaves 96 government studies on marijuana abuse. Everything from "Assessment of Cannabis Craving in Schizophrenia Using Virtual Reality" to, I kid you not, "Nicotine for Marijuana Withdrawal."

    This is an issue where the government started with the "fact" that marijuana is highly abusive and they set out to study the properties of that "fact". Unfortunately, it's a fact created by what used to be the politically advantageous War on Drugs. Scientifically, it was convenient to skip that important step of researching marijuana use, on it's own, without the "abuse" tagged on there. It's like researching pipelines and treating it as fact that pipelines are intrinsically beneficial.

    The non-governmental studies are more balanced. Of the 41 studies, 10 are proper medical marijuana clinical studies. There's "Cannabis for Spasticity in Multiple Sclerosis", "Marijuana for Cancer Pain", "Marijuana for HIV-Related Peripheral Neuropathy" and more. All of them were performed in California, thanks to a bill passed by the state legislature allowing funding for medical marijuana research. Yet the NGO studies are all small, nothing close to the studies with thousands of participants that the FDA requires.

    Unfortunately, NGO studies don't help when trying to gain FDA approval. The FDA application process requires NIDA's approval. The one medical marijuana study NIDA has approved has a whopping 52 participants. Studies in the thousands are required by the FDA. And yet without FDA approval, marijuana remains a schedule I drug. A drug that is intrinsically highly abusive because that's what was politically convenient to label it as in 1970. That legally defined characteristic of abusiveness means the overwhelming majority of research is devoted to finding a cure for it's intrinsic abusiveness. Too bad they're the only one's who can supply the research necessary to prove themselves wrong.

Originally posted to Sagan on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:24 PM PDT.

Also republished by DKos Cannabis Law and Drug War Reform.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site