Skip to main content

Following two weeks of marking up Republican-backed immigration “reform” legislation in the House Judiciary Committee, we are now turning our sights towards two issues that have dominated the news recently: the Voting Rights Act and the federal government’s surveillance programs and related authorities.

Today at 10 am we are holding a full committee oversight hearing on the Administration’s Use of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Authorities. All Members on Judiciary, Republican and Democratic alike, are concerned about whether the White House has taken an overly broad view of the FISA authorities described in recent media reports.  There is growing bipartisan consensus that the sprawling surveillance apparatus employed by the government has extended far beyond what Congress intended when it amended the USA PATRIOT Act in 2005 and passed the FISA Amendments Act in 2008.  

To assess the various viewpoints and concerns that have arisen over the past several weeks, this hearing will feature two panels of witnesses. Witnesses from the first panel will feature key players within the federal government agencies involved with interpreting the FISA legislation and carrying out the clandestine, surveillance activities. The first set of panelists include: Mr. James Cole with the U.S. Department of Justice, Mr John C. Inglis with the National Security Agency (NSA), Mr. Robert S. Litt with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and Ms. Stephanie Douglas with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) National Security Branch. The second panel will feature witnesses from a range of firms and organizations with an interest in civil liberties, national security and the rule of law - including: Mr. Stewart Baker with Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Mr. Steven G. Bradbury with Dechert, LLP, Mr. Jameel Jaffer with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and Ms. Kate Martin with the Center for National Security Studies.

--

After wrapping up our oversight activities, the Judiciary Committee will turn its attention this Thursday to the “Voting Rights Act after the Supreme Court’s Decision in Shelby County.” This hearing will take place in the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice at 11 am.

This hearing comes on the heels of a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing yesterday entitled, "From Selma to Shelby County: Working Together to Restore the Protections of the Voting Rights Act.” At the hearing, civil rights champion Congressman John Lewis testified alongside the former Republican House Judiciary Chairman who led the reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act in 2006 - Jim Sensenbrenner.

Witnesses for our House Judiciary hearing include Mr. J. Christian Adams, with the Election Law Center, Mr. Robert Kengle, with the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Mr. Hans A.von Spakovsky, with The Heritage Foundation, Mr. Spencer Overton, with The George Washington University Law School.

Be sure to follow @HouseJudDems for live-tweets from the two hearings.

Congressman John Conyers, Jr.
Ranking Member, U.S. House Judiciary Committee

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site