Haven't seen this here yet, so here goes:
With the Friday ruling by the U.S. District Judge Callie V.S. Granade in the couple's favor, the Court declared both Alabama's statutory and constitutional gay marriage bans to be in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Now along comes the Alabama Probate Judge Association trying the same thing the clerks association did in Florida.
From the Daily Journal comes this:
Additional litigation is almost a certainty. The Alabama Probate Judge Association issued a statement Saturday saying there was nothing in the order to require judges to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
"As probate judges, our duty is to issue marriage licenses in accordance with Alabama law and that means we cannot legally issue marriage licenses to same sex couples. The recent federal ruling does not change that," said Monroe County Probate Judge Greg Norris, the president of the judges' association.
Granted, I have not read the full decision, but it just seems odd to me that when you rule a law unconstitutional, it should apply to all, not just those who brought the case.
update: fixed the judges name (not the court case) and found a cpy of the decision on Scribd here