Rand Paul says something something Bill Clinton therefore Hillary bad

This will likely be the last month of Rand Paul's presidential campaign. Can't imagine why.

Sen. Rand Paul has been, since the inception of his supposed presidential campaign, going on and on about how Hillary Clinton shouldn't be president because Bill Clinton is bad. It's been his thing. In the waning days of his campaign, he's still at it.

A day after a New Hampshire state legislator heckled Clinton about her husband’s sex life during a campaign event, Jeffrey T. Kuhner, a WRKO radio host in Boston asked Paul if sexual harassment and assault claims against former president Bill Clinton “and her role in trying to cover it up and protect him” were a legitimate campaign issue.

Paul initially replied that it is not “necessarily her fault,” that “her husband has committed serial infidelities,” but then slammed the former Secretary of State for having spoken out against sexual assaults in a recent campaign speech.

Of course, if Rand Paul wants to talk about Bill Clinton nobody's been stopping him from doing it. It hasn't gained traction so far, however, and considering how ... turgidly ... the press has longed to return to the good old 1990's days of right-wing conspiracy theorists happily shoveling lunatic claim after lunatic claim from their lowbrow radio shows into the ol' Serious News gullet, Paul's inability to attract press attention with his own various pronouncements speaks rather poorly of Paul.

But no, nobody's stopping him from arguing that Bill Clinton is bad, therefore something-something Hillary Clinton. Go for it, knock yourself out, happy trails, goodbye.