"Bloggign theory", one pt.

One point, regarding "blogging" and, I suppose, more of social going – a matter become of some experience, in other community, quite really – the thang, in incidence: "Do not rush into audience, expecting riot to ensue".

(Tersely put)

Update (in one line) : Well, that was kind of a rough thought — not explitily noted as so, then, albeit.

In the ext. text: Well, some more "billeting", in short expression, for/about language.

"Kindly FYI", however tangential, regarding language: Some study and/or practice of poetry may afford some breadth of means for expression.

Incidental ref. with an explanation, wrapped on it: When I break-off some time, for it, I enjoy the writings of William Carlos Williams (e.g.),  as his being "one poet and person".

(Update: Of course, Mr. So is one poet, and a person, not "in profile to the reader".)

Another thought: One may try to not be patronizing, with language, when intending to not be patronizing, in any – so in order to avoid misperception, if-but, however, to "interrupt" a perception.

(When reading over any of my own works, later, I, as one, might think, "Hell, that sure doesn't sound right." So, I now try to edit what I may, when it seems worth the while, and to set my foot, pretty well, about politcking, before encountering such, about language and/or "expression". I'm trying to not intimidate or worry, either, to the avoidance of any "shock and loathing", or "fear and awe", or "what and what????????")

{kind end-phrase – uh, Tortillas}


"While it is poetry, the expressions, in verse, may seem almost discontinuous."