For those of you who missed it, the Washington Post ("Campaign Ads Enrich Advisers, Raise Questions")
ran a front page story about Trippi's take from the $41 million and whether or not their is a conflict of interest.
I for one was actually pleased that because according to this article TMS cut was only 7% of the buy (not 15% as previously reported). Also interesting how long it took the mainstream media to catch up to the Blogosphere on this story (about a week). Here's the link.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26975-2004Feb9.html?nav=headlines