<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>oldandcranky</title>
<link>https://www.dailykos.com/user/oldandcranky/rss/index.xml</link>
<description>News Community Action</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 - Steal what you want</copyright>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 04:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 04:59:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<managingEditor>Daily Kos rss@dailykos.com (Daily Kos)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>Daily Kos rss@dailykos.com (Daily Kos)</webMaster>

<item>
<title>McCain Was For Embryonic Stem Cell Research While He Was Against It</title>
<link>https://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/14/599095/-McCain-Was-For-Embryonic-Stem-Cell-Research-While-He-Was-Against-It</link>
<description>&#x3C;p&#x3E;Politicians sometimes take a stand for a policy. Sometimes they take a stand against a policy. Sometimes they are for a policy before they change their mind and are against it.&#x3C;/p&#x3E;

&#x3C;p&#x3E;With embryonic stem cell research, McCain has found a new path - he&#x27;s for it &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;strong&#x3E;at the very same time&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; he is against it. That is, if you can believe his latest ads (and it&#x27;s not that easy to believe McCain campaign ads).&#x3C;/p&#x3E;

</description>
<author>rss@dailykos.com (oldandcranky)</author>
<category>2008</category>
<category>Abortion</category>
<category>Ads</category>
<category>Election</category>
<category>embryo</category>
<category>Lies</category>
<category>mcCain</category>
<category>Presidency</category>
<category>Rescue</category>
<category>Research</category>
<category>Stem Cell</category>
<category>StemCell</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">_599095</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why Was Palin Making Commitments To Saakashvili?</title>
<link>https://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/11/595585/-Why-Was-Palin-Making-Commitments-To-Saakashvili</link>
<description>&#x3C;p&#x3E;An interesting nugget from her ABC interview is that she&#x27;s been on the phone with Saakashvili, and that she committed her full support.&#x3C;/p&#x3E;

&#x3C;p&#x3E;Saakashvili, whose country employs McCain foreign policy advisors as lobbyists.&#x3C;/p&#x3E;

&#x3C;p&#x3E;Why, at the very outset of a much needed educational process, was she on the phone, &#x3C;strong&#x3E;MAKING PERSONAL COMMITMENTS&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;, with this foreign power? Because she has had a chance to form her own opinion? Because it&#x27;s right for the country for her to get morally locked into a position now? Or because it fit someone&#x27;s neocon agenda to tie her down now?&#x3C;/p&#x3E;

</description>
<author>rss@dailykos.com (oldandcranky)</author>
<category>2008</category>
<category>ABC</category>
<category>CharlesGibson</category>
<category>Election</category>
<category>electiondiary</category>
<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
<category>Georgia</category>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>JohnMcCain</category>
<category>Presidency</category>
<category>saakashvili</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>SarahPalin</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">_595585</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Palin&#x27;s Extremism Means McCain Is No Longer Safe Moderate Choice</title>
<link>https://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/8/591827/-Palin-s-Extremism-Means-McCain-Is-No-Longer-Safe-Moderate-Choice</link>
<description>&#x3C;p&#x3E;Up until Palin&#x27;s selection I was on the fence in this election. I don&#x27;t like extremism. I fear that Obama, a liberal, teamed up with large Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress could lead to more liberal policies than I really want. I think that low capital gains taxes, especially on small businesses, is a good thing; that we might collect more corporation tax if we lower the nominal tax rate and reduce loopholes; that government solutions too often lead to impersonal and inefficient bureaucracies.&#x3C;/p&#x3E;

&#x3C;p&#x3E;In that regard, I could see a conservative Republican in the White House (and McCain is mostly conservative, although he has his moderate moments) disciplined by a Democratic congress could be a workable solution. McCain&#x27;s extremist tendencies would be checked by Congress, and he would, unlike Bush, probably compromise.&#x3C;/p&#x3E;

&#x3C;p&#x3E;The Palin selection blew that theory out of the water.&#x3C;/p&#x3E;

</description>
<author>rss@dailykos.com (oldandcranky)</author>
<category>2008</category>
<category>mcCain</category>
<category>Obama</category>
<category>Palin</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">_591827</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 05:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>