Oh man, reality is truly stranger than fiction.
"Jeff Gannon", the White House press
propagandist "correspondent" for the fake "Talon" news service, turns out to be using a nom de plume.
A group of dKos diarists have been peeling away the layers of Gannon's fake persona, summarized by World O'Crap. In one of those diaries, this revelation is made by Radically Bitter: Among the domains owned by Gannon/Guckert are these:
In case this isn't clear enough, those last three are gay sex-themed names. Suddenly, his picture
looks appropriately in character.
So why is this relevant, other than today seems to have become "Republicans and sex hypocrisy day"?
In reviewing White House press conferences from the past year, Media Matters for America has noted numerous instances in which Gannon's lobs -- leading questions that often include false assumptions favorable to the Bush administration -- have allowed McClellan to move to friendlier turf, away from having to answer questions on such issues as the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment; [...]
So in addition to the "hyprocrisy and sex" thing, we've got the "hypocrisy and gay" thing.
And no, this wasn't planned. It's not my fault the other side unloaded so much hypocrisy in a single day.
(In a sign of how I've lost complete control over this site, I note, with great irony, that I found out about the domain thing from Atrios.)
Update: There is some concern that focus on the more salacious details of Gannon's hypocrisy detracts from more substantive discussions and investigations currently going on by various diariests.
In a way, that may be true. Gannon is a propagandist, funded by god knows who, who essentially provide McClellan a lifeline whenever the White House press corps backs him into a corner.
I, along with most liberals, couldn't care less if one of our colleagues or employees is gay. That's a problem with right wingers, not our side.
So say Guckert's outing costs him his gravy train at Talon "News", and he is replaced by someone else, would that kill the issue?
I don't think so, but I could be wrong. Personally, I think it would add fire to the crusade if they cut him loose. And it's not as if the "propaganda" angle is tied to Guckert. That one belongs to Talon News, independent of which sycophant they have infesting the White House press room every day.
Comments are closed on this story.