I almost can't believe that I'm writing this, but....I'm going to defend Bill Richardson on the whole "is being gay a choice" thing.
Sort of.
For those of you who might have missed the brouhaha, here's the deal: during a round table discussion with the Democratic candidates about LGBT issues, Bill Richardson was asked if he thought that being gay was a choice. He said yes.
You could have heard a pin drop.
He was asked the question again. He said yes. It got very uncomfortable in the room. And he's getting a lot of flak for it.
Perhaps rightly so, but I think that the Left needs to think through more fully the reason why this position is so upsetting.
The logic goes something like this: "if it's a choice, then it can be condemned. If it's inborn, then it is morally neutral."
But this logic cedes the parameters and the terms of the argument to the anti-gay bigots. The Left does this frequently, and the Right is terrific at exploiting it: look at the way the Left's rhetoric of equality gets used by the Right to justify ending affirmative action and to support neo-segregation.
Read More