From today's Washington Post ((Don't) Meet the Press), Ruth Marcus argues:
It's not as if this president has been Mr. Openness. But by some important measures, George W. Bush is more accessible to the reporters who cover him than are some of the leading candidates to succeed him -- most notably Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
It is obvious that both Clinton and Obama are running tightly controlled campaigns. But Marcus' arguments misses a key point that helps explain why the Clinton and Obama camps are leery of the press. For whatever reason, over the past decade, the press on the whole has held Democratic candidates and elected officials to higher standards than Republicans. You see this on issue after issue, where Democrats get their answers parsed to death and analyzed for any internal contradictions, while Republicans are allowed to pass off glib evasions and outright lies as adequate responses.
Read More