On June 21st, a bipartisan group 31 members of the House of Representatives sent a letter to Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, asking for him to clarify both his rationale and justification for furloughing employees at activities which are funded by Working Capital Funds.
Activites such as these do not recieve directly appropriated funds from Congress. They recieve funding and tasking from customers at program offices, who have already had budgets reduced due to sequestration.
Seeing the potential for these budget reductions at the program level, many activities took pro-active steps to manage workload and resources, such as instituting hiring freezes, limiting overtime, and developing other product lines to draw in new customers.
Through these measures, these activities have created a sufficent buffer against the impacts of sequestration, and do not need to furlough employees. In fact, many agencies are actually behind in production, and are currently requiring overtime in order to meet tasking obligations with a reduced workforce.
Even though there is no business case to support it, furlough notices have gone out employees notifying them that they will be required to take 11 days of unpaid leave between now and the end of September.
Why? Because the Secretary of Defense has issued a politically motivated arbitrary policy, designed to amplify the effect of sequestration, while punishing career civil servants.
Read the letter that Congress sent below the jump
Read More