The details of the new sex trafficking charges against Jeffrey Epstein and witness statements as reported by the Miami Herald are eerily consistent with the behavior cited in the rape allegations against Trump and Epstein that were filed in June 2016. If you have the stomach for it, here are the court documents from that case. The sworn affidavits by Jane Doe, Plaintiff, cited as Document 1, attachment 1, and Tiffany Doe, attachment 2, are especially disturbing and hard to read.
Jane Doe:
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied me to a bed, exposed himself to me, and then proceeded to forcibly rape me. During the course of this savage sexual attack, I loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but he did not. Defendant Trump responded to my pleas by violently striking me in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted.
Tiffany Doe:
I persuaded the Plaintiff to attend a series of parties of Mr. Epstein that took place during the summer of 1994. I told her that, if she would join me at the parties, she would be introduced to people who could get her into the modeling profession and she would be paid for attending. . . It was at these series of parties that I personally witnessed the Plaintiff being forced to perform various sexual acts with Donald J. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were advised that she was 13 years old.
The rape charges were filed in June 2016, but were voluntarily withdrawn without prejudice in September. No reason was stated, but one can only imagine the pressure these women faced. Just speculating here, but it's conceivable that these charges could be refiled now that corroborating evidence is coming to light. Trump has been uncharacteristically quiet since Epstein's arrest.
Tuesday, Jul 9, 2019 · 10:15:37 PM +00:00
·
liberaldad2
Update: Based on many comments with more details about this case, it appears that the allegations against Trump are suspect, to say the least. While the scenario in the original filing may be plausible, its plausibility derives from publicly known information, while specific details have not held up under further investigation. Many thanks to all the commenters who provided greater detail about this case, including follow up filings and aspects that appear to be suspicious.