It has become increasingly evident over the last two weeks that there is a conflict of interest emerging between "the Community" on here and Kos's other activities, namely dem. consulting and the PAC, which seem to lead to a desire on his part to keep the site "sanitized", so as to avoid giving opponents an opening.
So for the last two weeks there have really been two worlds on here: one rather bland one in the center column, more liberal but not much more informative than cable news, and then the other one in the diaries, where I and many others go to find the latest vote fraud info.
Last night the conflict reached a new high over a perhaps spurious whistleblower letter and two diaries on the subject ("a" and "b"). Kos himself posted an angry comment.
I think that irrespective of where one stands on the issue of vote fraud per se, this conflict of interest (previously potential , now actual) merits thorough discussion.
The needs of an on-line community and a PAC may or may not be negotiable. They may or may not belong under one roof.
Comments?