Skip to main content

The Internet on which this wonderful site resides, on which I intend to post this message, exists, at least in some significant part, courtesy of its genesis via research funded through the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Thank you, U.S. taxpayers. Last time I checked, self-proclaimed "liberals" and anti-government "conservatives" benefit greatly and mutually from this "BIG government" investment.

When it seemed to me that I'd run out of options to stay out of trouble with the law in Chicago during the Vietnam-era, I joined the U.S. Army (in those days, enlistment standards were not as rigorous as they are today). That Army fed, clothed, and trained me (in a number of things, including how to kill people, unfortunately--I guess), all at taxpayer expense. Unaware of this at the time, but due to my enlistment, once (and if) I survived that service, I qualified for very generous GI Bill education benefits. I doubt I would have ever gone to, or at least completed, college without those taxpayer-supported benefits. When several of my jobs have allowed me to speak in front of groups about how I came to stand before them with whatever expertise I supposedly possessed, I have always made a point of expressing my gratitude for the opportunities military service and the GI Bill afforded me. I do admit, however, that for about ten years following my separation from service, I actually kept my veteran status a well-guarded secret. Being a veteran wasn't too popular in those days.

I've read in several different places that since its inception the nation's investment into the GI Bill of Rights has continually provided a six-one to seven-one dollar return to the U.S. economy. Not too shabby for the USA, right? Though I admit the impact of this investment might be interpreted differently by those people inhabiting countries to which we send our military, I am focused here more on how enlightened investment in a nation and its people can produce a number of fruitful outcomes. Even the fact that I haven't been a ward of the state in jail since I left the Army and have been employed (more or less) and paid taxes dutifully since my discharge is, to me, a positive result for those who invested in my rehabilitation.

When I did go to college and felt I didn't "fit in" (it was the Vietnam-era after all), I left for almost two years and worked on the railroad. This was during the Carter-era, during economic hard times for the post-war country, and one of President Carter's programs to help stimulate the economy involved infrastructure investment. Through this, I was allowed to labor from spring to fall over two years, contemplate the meaning of my life, and decide that college wasn't so bad after all.

One of the many jobs I've had since college, indeed, the longest-term job I've had, involved working with colleges and universities to help them find external funds for research and development programs. This position allowed me to see first-hand how immeasurable is the "good" that can come from wisely invested taxpayer dollars. My job involved close study of grant programs funded by the National Science Foundation, NASA, and NOAA. Over that period, I spoke with dozens of scientists who rotated from academe to those agencies to ensure that the very best use was made of the funds that were put under their stewardship. Those dollars can be traced to projects that not only a scientist's and his/her disciplinary research, but advances his/her teaching, after a grantee scientist returns to the classroom to teach the nation's future scientists and educators the results of those government-funded activities. Truly, I can't imagine too many more enlightened uses of taxpayer dollars.

Recently, doing some research for book I've been dreaming of writing, I studied quite a bit about the advance of the railroads across the expanding U.S. empire during the mid- to late-19th century. Through obscene land-grants (often illegal, or at least immoral from a Native American standpoint), tax-breaks or outright giveaways, and such crass political venality that might offend the comparably polite sensibilities of modern, anti-government mouthpieces, BIG government left its indelible footprint on the history of industrial progress by helping to link the coasts via rail. All the while, the most visible "journalists" of the period kept their readers titillated, if not ill-informed, about the ultimate "good" this progress would represent, even ultimately for those poor, unenlightened souls wandering the plains and living in tee-pees. In fact, if the Indians were not in the way of progress because they held undeserved title to certain lands through easily broken treaties, they were outright terrorists for occasionally attacking the Iron Horses that were galloping the rails of manifest destiny. And it's strange to admit that after reading about all of the excesses of this period, I still have a romantic spot in my heart for railroads. Go figure.

Were the 19th century political handmaids to industrialists more venal and craven than today's mouthpieces for higher-tech moguls and international investors? I don't know. Were the yellow journalists of that period any more unworthy of the job description, "chronicler" than FOX News reporters are to that of "correspondents." I don't know that, either. Having looked at what I've shared, I guess I'm just saying that I, like my conservative, anti-government  fellow citizens, really need me some pretty BIG government, whether I (or we) like it or not. I'm just not so sure my conservative, anti-government friends ever really consider how much that government has defined, and sustains, the myth of who we think we are as Americans.  

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (4+ / 0-)

    “I discover myself on the verge of a usual mistake.” ― Walt Whitman, Song of Myself

    by dannyboy1 on Fri Nov 30, 2012 at 08:43:34 AM PST

  •  People who complain about "Big Government" (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    EthrDemon

    remind me of the people who complain that the tax code is complicated. Really, what they are complaining about is that the world isn't simple.

    We have more than a quarter of a billion people in this, (still) the richest and most powerful nation that has ever existed. Just as the tax code is complex because commerce is complex and the rules must cover many different situations fairly, the government of the United States is large because the United States is large and its ongoing needs are numerous and complex.

    The government should be the size it needs to be to adequately manage the peoples' interests, no larger or smaller. That "less government" results in popular benefit rather than merely the further empowerment of elites, is a falsehood that I think, at long last, we are all starting to see through.

    Visit Lacking All Conviction, your patch of grey on those too-sunny days.

    by eataTREE on Fri Nov 30, 2012 at 08:54:12 AM PST

  •  To answer your question about the 19th century (0+ / 0-)

    Yeah, the politicians and the media sucked a lot.   We seem to have slid back into a similar era, although the federal govt has a lot more inertia and checks/balances than it did then.

    Leaving aside the small matter of the political split that ended in the Civil War, a look at two topics in depth will give you a sense of our inheritance.

    1.  Indian treaties.   Man, we were really good at proposing treaties in perpetuity and then tearing them up the second we had some settlers near their land.  The Israeli settlement of Palistinian lands is a very weak pale imitation of what the USA did.

    2.  Railway contracts.  OMFG - the ponzi schemes, the graft, the political deals, the vast amounts of money.  It was the 90s internet bubble, Madoff and the Great Recession all rolled into one, and ended with something called the "Guilded age" with massive wealth inequality.

    (just to pick a single thing, bought and paid for politicians made the government railroad grants for intercontinental railways tied to length of track.  no oversight for QUALITY of track, and no oversight for things like making the track wind around all over the place instead of just going straight.   A lot of the early intercontinental railways got rebuilt or bypassed once actual traffic had to use them and drove demand.  There was also big scandals with bridges for trains collapsing and killing everyone on board...a disturbingly common thing until enough outrage got some standards in place there)

    •  Agree and (0+ / 0-)

      there were tons of "bridges to nowhere" with politicians with land holdings in states directly connected with RR financiers jockeying through huge land give-aways to get competing track lines to move through their states and build stations on or near their land holdings. The hoopla in the press over the whole enterprise of linking the coasts by rail was about as irrational as the chorus around gearing the country for war after 9/11. I sometimes wonder if there were as many skeptics then as I suspect there were in the past decade over what the politicians and propagandists were up to. I guess that's where the term "getting railroaded" comes from. The power behind these misadventures gets so cranked-up that people get led to believe that there's nothing they can do to stop it.

      “I discover myself on the verge of a usual mistake.” ― Walt Whitman, Song of Myself

      by dannyboy1 on Mon Dec 03, 2012 at 05:19:36 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site