ND Republican Margaret Sitte said she wrote the ND Personhood Constitutional Amendment to "effectively end abortion in ND" and make sure "women have adequate follow-up care they need" after an abortion --- WTF???!!??
Margaret Sittes (R) was interviewed by Huffingtonpost
Sitte said that while the bill could effectively end abortion in North Dakota, she supports the bill because it would protect women who experience medical complications after the procedure.
Only an ignorant fool would think that any legislation would "end abortion" since, it seems to me that anyone with an IQ above 3 knows that women used Coat Hangers to terminate their pregnancy before Roe v Wade.
But, the keyword Margaret Sittes used was "effectively" ... "effectively end abortion"
Well, perhaps Dr. Coat Hanger does not an ideal nor "effective" way of getting an abortion as the woman could bleed to death without a licensed doctor performing that medical procedure. (kind of like taking a shot of whiskey and grabbing your tree-saw to cut off your leg -- you might bleed to death -- best to go to a doctor)
In the interview Margaret Sittes pretends she gives a crap about the follow-up care a woman needs after she gets an abortion.
SITTES: "Yes, this bill could possibly close the abortion clinic [in Fargo]. I'm not saying that's the intention of the law. The intention of the law is to ensure that women have adequate health care and the follow-up care that they need."
Bullsh_t!
Right now, currently, women who go to a licensed doctor to get an abortion have access to "follow-up care" by a licensed physician ... a woman will not have "follow-up care" by a licensed physician if they are forced to use a Coat Hanger.
Look, in my opinion, if you don't want the legal medical procedure: abortion, then do not get one. However, anyone who tirelessly fights to literally end safe and legal abortions must be vying to open up a Coat Hanger factory so they can profit off of women who will get abortions -- because -- no one with an IQ above 3 could possibly think that ending safe and legal abortions will end abortions.
Margaret Sittes Bill Res 4009 is written in a manner that proclaims "human" life begins as the sperm dashes toward the egg and 'that' life must be protected at every stage of development.
ND Resolution 4009:
Section 1:
The inalienable right to life of every human being at any stage of development must be recognized and protected.”
I do not think there is a respectable scientist on the planet earth who would scientifically conclude that "human" life begins at the stage when the sperm swims toward the egg.
In fact, I do not think there is a respectable scientist on the planet earth who would scientifically conclude that "human" life begins at that stage when the sperm fertilizes the egg.
If Margaret Sittes really, truly, wanted to reduce/end abortions, she would fight to educate both genders on use of: condoms, birth control, morning after pill etc.
This Constitutional Personhood Amendment is bullsh_t and deceitful and is in no way intended to actually "end abortions." Face it, Margaret Sittes, the ND Republican, does not give one damn about keeping safe after an abortion ... and I know this is a very crude questions, but I must ask, is Margaret Sittes (R) vying to open a Coat Hanger Factory?
She sure doesn't seem to give a shit about women's health.