When people fantasize about a conspiracy to elect Clinton...I can't believe it.
Lets look at the process.
For in person votes, counting votes is performed first at the polling station for vote in person and then aggregated at the county.
We have over 3000 counties in the USA.
Lets pretend that there are only 15 polling stations per county though I'm willing to bet the number is probably much higher than that. So that would give us 45000 polling stations.
Every polling station I ever voted at had multiple officials...but lets say the number was only 2 per polling station.
So to corrupt the vote count, there would need to be at least two people at the polling station willing to commit a crime.
Those polling officials get the counts and send the counts to the county registrar.
If I were responsible for a voting station, I would certainly verify that the accurate numbers were recorded. So the same 90,000 people that performed the count would have a large number of people verifying that the counts were accurately recorded at the county.
Do we really believe that there is a conspiracy of 90,000 people to elect Clinton?
Even in states that are under GOP control? And the co-conspirators can keep it hush hush?
I actually think that vote by mail is easier to manipulate...because instead of needing 90,000 co-conspirators...you'd only need 3000 - 6000 co-conspirators (1-2 in each county). Still highly dubious that there could be that large a conspiracy.
Its just bizarre to me that people think that is possible.
Voter rolls are maintained at the county level...so to control voter rolls, you'd still need 3000-6000 co-conspirators. No one at the registrar knows how any of the registered voters are going to vote in the future. So any purge or failure to process registrations would hit all candidates supporters not just Sanders supporters.
To believe that there is any degree of corruption in the process is to believe an impossibly large number of people are both in support of Hillary Clinton and willing to commit a crime on her behalf.
I won't say that individual people could be biases. And obviously the entire voting process has biases because not all people have equal access to the vote.
I won’t say that there aren’t glaring mistakes...incompetent people like the horror overseeing the Brooklyn voter roles. But that’s not conspiracy: it is normal human error that will occur when you have a process which involves a minimum of 100,000 people involved in a large complex task. Even if they all try to be sincere: some may make innocent mistakes: others may make mistakes due to lack of attention and diligence.
But a Clinton conspiracy? Let me sell you one of the bridges I have for sale.