Electoral Fairness Amendment

No, this isn't about doing away with the Electoral College.  I won't deny that the Federal nature of our republic is an indelible part of the fabric of this great nation (blah blah blah).

But our system should not paternalistically give electoral handouts to low population states.  
Sure, when we were primarily an agrian nation it might have made sense, but now agriculture accounts for 1.4 % (ONE POINT FOUR FRIGGIN' PERCENT!) of our national economy.  It's time for low-population states to ba allowed to stand on their own two feet in the Electoral College.

How?  The solution is simple.  Change the electoral college so that each state has one-vote per Congressional District -- so that it is truly a population-weighted institution, thereby duly reflecting the people that make this nation great.

Get this:  there are roughly 620,000 New Yorkers for each EV.  Yet only 346,000 Nebraskans have to share one.  Either its a mockery of one-person-one-vote, or they're counting cows, now, too!

Under an Electoral Fairness Amendment, each state can still decide how to select its electors.  It's just that the number of them would be fair.

Let's put it this way:  if you oppose the EFA, you're against fairness.  Anything is just your typical Republican elitism, or nuance.