I don't write here very often, but sometimes an issue comes up that is important enough to share with this group.
By way of background, the Fair Housing Act is a 1968 law that (as amended) prohibits housing discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability and familial status (the presence of children under 18 in a household). This is a bit of an oversimplification, but under the Act, one can prove discrimination under a theory of disparate treatment - i.e., that landlord INTENTIONALLY failed to rent to me because I have a disability, am a woman, am African-American, etc. Though there are several ways to prove it, that THEORY is pretty non-controversial.
What's slightly more controversial is a theory called "disparate impact." Disparate impact refers to a policy or procedure that is neutral on its face (in other words, it doesn't explicitly prohibit someone who's black or disabled from getting housing) but in practice comes down harder on some than others. The beauty of disparate impact is that you don't have to prove intent (although it's often there); all you have to show is that the policy has the impact. If the housing provider can't justify the policy and show that it's the least discriminatory way to serve its purpose, he loses.
Read More