Skip to main content


Thu Feb 07, 2013 at 05:29 AM PST

MORRIS: SCOTT WALKER’S KISS OF DEATH?

by twresq

    The comment that jumped out to me from Dick Morris’ brief interview with Piers Morgan on Feb. 6, 2013 [http://piersmorgan.blogs.cnn.com/...] was his statement that he thought that Scott Walker would be the GOP’s ideal presidential nominee in 2016.  Scott Walker?  
        At first I just thought that this was another in a long string of Mr. Morris' ridiculously wrong punditry.  The Guardian’s Harry J. Enten has written several articles about his hilariously wrong punditry:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/... http://www.guardian.co.uk/....   However, a Google search of Morris and Scott Walker pulled up a recent article by Media Matters which probably best explains the Dick Morris phenomenon:    http://mediamatters.org/....  It explains Mr. Morris’ love of Scott Walker as well as much of his punditry.  It’s not so much that he is so incredibly stupid; but rather, he’s so incredibly “unethical” (in Media Matter’s words and opinion).  Everyone who pays for him (in particular his email list) gets the Dick Morris imprimatur.  
    Now I doubt that Mr. Morris’ firing by FOX news has anything to do with his ethical lapses. Rather I suspect that he (and Palin) finally reached FOX’s obviously high threshold limit of buffoonery.  However, without his ability to use FOX to sell his mailing list, his future must be dim.   I believe he truly looked like a broken man on CNN.  His shaking hands were a give-away (assuming there is not a physiological reason for this symptom).  I must say, I’m shedding a few tears -- of the crocodile nature -- today for what I suspect is the end of an extremely entertaining career.

Discuss

Mon Dec 24, 2012 at 03:59 AM PST

Romney didn't define himself

by twresq

    According to the Boston Globe article:  The story behind Mitt Romney’s loss (http://www.boston.com/...), the Romney campaign is flailing the emerged meme that the principal problem with the Romney campaign was that they, for various reasons, chose not to define himself.  This left the Obama campaign the luxury of defining him as a socially awkward, venture capitalist who was disinterested in the wellbeing of others and who had dedicated his life to the pursuit of lucre regardless of the negative social consequences of his actions (as opposed presumably to other businessmen – such as Warren Buffet -- who had a social consciousness and who were interested in creating businesses with jobs which benefited American society as a whole).  According to this conservative meme, Romney was in fact a man of deep warmth, moral conviction and social consciousness and he could have won if only America had discovered the truth.
   I disagree with this contention.  As a Mormon, I think that I have an accurate take on what type of man Mr. Romney is.  Being raised in Utah, I know that Mormonism (as with other very conservative Christian religions) put heavy (although not exclusive) emphasis on familial – especially sexual – fidelity.  I have no doubt that Mr. Romney is a man of personal, religious consciousness who is completely dedicated to his religion and family.  I certainly think this is admirable.  However it has been noted that Mormonism places little emphasis upon general, social consciousness and business integrity.   As someone well acquainted with Mr. Romney, I was never confused about what type of man Mr. Romney was.  
   Matt Taibbi in his Rolling Stone article – Greed and Debt:  The true story of Mitt Romney and Bain Capital (http://www.rollingstone.com/...), outlined the type of capitalist that I believe Mitt Romney was and which is completely consistent with the beliefs of Mr. Romney and many people raised like him.  Although Mr. Romney would never be unfaithful to his marital vows, earning money at any cost is moral and good.  After all, the purpose of Bain Capital (in Mr. Romney's own words) was to “harvest” companies, not to build them.  There is a place for this in capitalism, but it was completely consistent with the definition of Mr. Romney created by the Obama campaign and it was a fatal mistake for the Republicans to nominate a venture capitalist in light of the economic crises of 2008.  
   To put it bluntly, one cannot effectively rebut the truth and the truth is that Mitt Romney was an amoral venture capitalist.  It wasn't an error for the Romney campaign not to re-define himself, because Mr. Romney and his campaign knew that it would have been futile.  I wish the press would address this point rather than just putting forward the meme that the Romney campaign could have, should have, would have responded to the Obama assault.

Discuss

In light of Amb. Rice's withdrawal

Continue Reading

Fri Nov 09, 2012 at 05:29 AM PST

ROMNEY2016 -- A MESSAGE FROM MITT

by twresq

A MESSAGE from MITT ROMNEY to UNMARRIED FEMALE UNITS

Continue Reading
You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.

RSS

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site