As a relative newbie to dKos -- as kick-butt a site as there is on the 'net -- I am not entirely familiar with the genesis of the whole "fraudster vs. 'reality-based'" debate, but the whole thing bugs me to no end.
First of all, a fraudster is someone who commits fraud. Those of us who take the position that fraud occurred on a massive scale in the 2004 elections are not fraudsters. You can imagine me in a tinfoil hat if it helps you deal with the fact that you are regularly lied to by the mass media and that you swallow these lies. But don't call me a fraudster.
Now that that's out of the way, let's get to the point: I'm throwing down a gauntlet.
Read More