Assuming it does not already have a name.
One of the things that always fascinated me in my economy classes was the idea that a single dollar, on average, would get spent more than thirty times during a year - at least when I was taught that. That is an immensely powerful concept; the rate of trade for goods and services is an economic force multiplier.
This philosophy is not conservative. It gives no direct weight to things that have been done in the past, except to note where the past has succeeded or failed. It is not liberal - it is not incompatible with the idea of personal freedom, but that is not the goal. Calling it centrist misses the point, in my opinion, as it has a definition separate from simply being 'in between'.
The core idea, rather than minimizing government or ensuring guaranteed social programs, is to drive economic output - maximizing that multiplier. The more productive a society's individuals, the greater its internal trust, the easier it is for people to cooperate, and the faster trade itself flows, the more powerful that society's economy will be.
Read More