About a year and a half ago, the Supreme Court decided an landmark case on gun rights, taking up for the first time in 70 years whether individuals have a Constitutional right to own firearms. The case was decided in favor of individual gun owners, overthrowing many state and local gun laws in the process. In general it was probably the right decision, although the full impact has yet to be felt. And in the grand scheme of things, as broad as that decision was, it was still in the realm of deciding a clearly Constitutional issue, no matter whether you agree or disagree with the outcome.
Now imagine if the court had instead of limiting the case, they had decided on much broader grounds, whether individuals had a right to own any type of weapon. Remember, the 2nd Amendment says arms, not firearms. If they had gone so far in such a case, they might have allowed individuals to own nuclear weapons. And that is the equivalent to what the Supreme Court has just done to the First Amendment.
Read More