Well, I'm still on the bank thing. Some heavyweight economists have come out with their prescription for the problem in today's WSJ, which I happen to agree with.
Underneath this I reference another Geithner article, this one from yesterday's WSJ (A3). I can't really analyze what's wrong the first paragraph, it just seems to somehow characterize the vagueness of Geithner's goals.
The second and third paragraphs bother me for two reasons. Number one, Obama went to the G-20 asking for this, and basically got shot down by other world leaders. Especially negative was Germany, which is significant because they are one of the few countries in the world actually sitting on cash at the moment, and they rejected our plea for stimulus. So it seems Geithner is unlikely to succeed where Obama failed.
The second thing that bothers me about these paragraphs is that I have a feeling Geithner is setting up his excuse for failure here--- getting ready to say that his plans failed because the world didn't stimulate enough.
I include the fourth paragraph simply because it is so goofy, another thing that bothers me about Geithner. Is someone proposing that we not have a financial system in the world?
Read More