In the primary campaign, does it only make sense to support exclusively the one candidate you think is best/best of the "viable"/most electable etc.? Or is there a case to be made that the primary process is somewhat "parliamentary"?
I don't mean only in the unlikely event that there's a brokered convention. Could it be that supporting a fringe or single-issue candidate in the primary process is a way of moving the "serious" candidates in a progressive direction?
Follow me below the fold for my anecdotal experience with Brown '92 and a poll...
Read More