Just saw an article on CNN, and it struck me how it seemed to speak exactly to a story I read (here?) last week, that the men who are so gung-ho about the South Dakota abortion law had better pre prepared to pay child support, as there wasn't DNA paternal testing pre-Roe. Yes, that's right; if she has to bear the child, YOU also have to support the child.
Well, maybe not, according to this lawsuit:
http://www.cnn.com/...
Self-serving, arrogant, thick-headed, childish. I don't see how the people involved can compare this lawsuit to Roe and not feel deep, deep shame.
(Apologies since I can't link to the original story from DKos, if that's where I saw it. I did a few keyword searches and browsed the "abortion" tagged stories but didn't come across the one I'm talking about. please comment the original source in the comments if you can find it!)