http://www.bc.edu/research/cjl/meta-elements/texts/reviews/gibson_cunningham.htm
This piece is written from the perspective of a believing Christian, who actually knows the history, and understands scripture in the context of that history.
There are so many lies connected to this film. Gibson's publicist said that there was no scene in which Jews physically harmed Jesus--a lie. Gibson said he was cutting out the line "His blood be on us and our children"--he left the line in, and simply removed the subtitle that translated it. Gibson said the movie was an accurate portrayal of the Gospel story, but in fact it's a distortion of it. He basically adapted the deranged writings of a 19th century nun, who believed that Jews in HER OWN TIME were murdering Christian babies to drain their blood for the Passover rituals.
Some people think anti-semitism means hating all Jews. It doesn't. You might as well say "Birth of a Nation" isn't racist because it shows several black characters who are good people--faithful servants to their Ku Klux Klan masters, played by white actors in blackface.
"The Passion" shows good Jewish people--but the obvious implication is that most, if not all of them, will become followers of Christ. But those who remain faithful to their religion are allied with Satan. So perhaps "Anti-Judaism" is the better term. But doesn't it amount to the same thing, effectively speaking?
It is the duty of every Christian to speak out against the distortions of this film. That is not the same thing as speaking out against Christ or Christianity. Because that isn't Jesus Christ up there on the screen. That's just a WASPy looking Italian American actor, being directed by a crazy former movie star, who believes that only Catholics who reject Vatican II are going to heaven. But doesn't mind taking money from Evangelical Christians, even though he knows they are all hellbound. Anyway, that's what Sister Emmerich says. He saw nothing Anti-Semitic in her ravings, so I'm sure he saw nothing anti-Protestant about that.
;-)