"I voted for the bill that would have paid for itself, I voted against the bill that just added the debt to our growing deficit."
"I voted for the bill that would have rolled back some tax cuts in a time of war to pay for that war. Bush threatened to veto that bill. I voted against the version Bush preferred that added another 87 Billion to our national debt."
Have I got the circumstances wrong? That's the way I thought things went down... not because of Dean pressure... Why don't they at least point out that Bush threatened to veto troop funding? Take this on the offensive.
If I do have my facts wrong can someone please correct me? It seems braindead easy to beat down that bullshit... but so far they've said everything but in defense.