Skip to main content

In responding to the thread Big Head George & Directorial Manipulation, I got long winded. I figured it might be better to post my response as a separate diary entry.

You've been forewarned.

In straightforward news shots like people speaking at podiums, you want to zoom in as much as possible without cropping pertinent information. The standard shot was the one of Kerry. Head, torso, down to the top of the podium where you could see the traffic lights. No new information is gathered by including erroneous space above ones head or below the top of a a podium with nothing on the front of it. This shot was used on Kerry in both podium debates.

Any anamoly from this standard looks freaky, especially when it's smack up against a standard shot in split screen.

In the first debate the cameras were at the same zoom level, and they attempted to equalize by shifting Bush up in the frame. This dedicated the bottom of his frame to the front of a blank podium. The effect was likened to a short person standing on a box.

How did they try to correct this?

In last night's debate Kerry maintained the same zoom level, but in attempting to fill the frame with Bush according to standard, leaving out the erroneous podium front, they zoomed in on him. This cut him off mid torso and the effect was likened to someone stepping forward and getting "in your face". It also left out the "all-important" podium lights.

No one likes their personal space invaded, and that is what it felt like to me. I felt the urge to lean back when to compensate when it came to him. Thus the freaky huge head effect.

If the compensation were made differently?

Scenario 1, matching the framing techniques of the first debate, could have given Bush the standard shot and shifted the frame on Kerry so that he was cut off mid-torso. This would have been the same framing you saw in last night's debate, only swapped between candidates (Bush standard framing, Kerry cut off, no podium lights). The difference though would be that head sizes would have remained consistent, saving us from the huge head/in your face effect. Surely this would have been a better solution.

Scenario 2, zoom technique, but compensating in the other direction, i.e. giving Bush the standard shot and zooming out on Kerry. This would have included all information (instead of cropping off lights for one candidate) but would have given Kerry the freaky effect, in that he would have appeared small and doll-like.

Those darned lights. If there were none, then it would not have to be counted as important information. You could have shot them much like in scenario 1, but said screw the lights for both candidates. After all, it must not have been important any more if Bush's were no longer shown.

If no lights were shown for either, and therefore no marker like the top of a podium to go by, the height difference would have been minimized in the best way possible. Same zoom, crop Bush's shot to just above the podium, Kerry mid-torso. Heck, if you want lights, run a third frame across the bottom showing the lights in front of the moderator. Harder to measure height difference that way.

Last night's camera zoom adjustments made it seem like the camera person was Desparately Seeking Balance. The changes in zoom on Bush were like watching reruns of Laugh-In.

Originally posted to conceptual continuity on Thu Oct 14, 2004 at 06:39 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  what lights? (none)
    Am I blind? I didn't see the traffic lights on the podia, just large ones on the stage. I figure Bush-Cheney decided having the lights had backfired and moved them away because Bush needs to ramble and sloganize so much to use up the 2 minutes on many questions, and the TV audience shouldn't see that. Were there lights right on the front of each podium last night?

    "We -- even we here -- hold the power, and bear the responsibility." --A. Lincoln

    by uffdalib on Thu Oct 14, 2004 at 06:46:57 AM PDT

  •  NBA Debate Jam video game easter eggs (none)
    Sports video games have these hidden "easter eggs" that unlock with special secret codes entered that do goofy effects on the gameplay or graphics. One of the most famous is 'big head' mode. Basically you get these tiny bodies with huge heads of athletes all over your screen.

    I kept expecting Shaq to come flying from the edge of the screen to reject Dubya.

    "If you want to be released from the burdens of republicanism, listen to me!" -Bruce Springsteen, Vote for Change Concert

    by nyetsoup4you on Thu Oct 14, 2004 at 07:18:13 AM PDT

  •  asdf (none)
    I didn't feel the affect of having my space invaded.  To me it was more comical.  Big Head Bush reminded me of the Staypuff marshmallow man from Ghostbusters, or a Macy's Thanksgiving Day balloon.

    It was surreal.

  •  Bush kept stretching his neck (none)
    and dropping his shoulders.  He did it so often, he must've been coached to prevent the slouch.  It got so bad at one point his head looked like a Macy's balloon.  Bush still hasn't mastered his body language like a Clinton, Reagan or other politician who has achieved office based upon merit rather than daddy's connections.  If Americans needed reminding of why we originally abandoned hereditary leadership, then the Indolent Prince George has given it to them in spades.  

    Power is perception. If you have to fight, you've already lost the first battle.

    by No One No Where on Thu Oct 14, 2004 at 07:30:59 AM PDT

Click here for the mobile view of the site