Daily Kos

the audacity of hope

Sat Sep 04, 2004 at 11:30:07 PM PDT

I was just rewatching the New York Times clip of Barack Obama's keynote speech at the Democratic Convention...

God, it was just so good.  One of the greatest speeches in import, in content, in tone that I have had the privelege of witnessing as it happened.  Truly, Obama is a gift to our party and, I hope, as the next Senator from Illinois, he will be a pathbreaking leader for our nation.

But there's more to it than that, I watched that speech again for a reason....I think Barack Obama was laying something out for us that we ignore at our peril...

It's not EASY  to try do what's right, and, at the same time, to play in the hardball world of American politics:

we all know that between the media and those who play rough, there is not alot of room for folks who aspire to speak the truth and work for justice in the American political system.

Let's be honest.  Barack Obama, a state legislator from Illinois running for a State-wide Federal seat for the first time represents something pure and hopeful for all of us here.  We see him and we think of so many things that he might be and do.  He is such a powerful example of potential, of promise, of what we aspire to be as Democrats.  There were things he said...a tone he took...in that speech that spoke to us.  We felt here is a man who truly understands our hopes and ideals and the calibration of our aspirations, here is a man who can see our brighter tomorrow and the very real road we will take to get there.

I liked how Barack Obama grounded that hope to struggle....how he used the phrase..."the audacity of hope".  Because, at its core, that is the tonic that we need to get in touch with right now.  And I think we need to understand that, on some deep level:

John Kerry is very much like Barack Obama.  John Kerry was a smart, skinny, ungainly vet who gave a speech that, if he had done nothing else in his life, would have made its own mark on history.  John Kerry was the Veteran who made this speech over thirty years ago:

Each day to facilitate the process by which the United States washes her hands of Vietnam someone has to give up his life so that the United States doesn't have to admit something that the entire world already knows, so that we can't say that we have made a mistake. Someone has to die so that President Nixon won't be, and these are his words, "the first President to lose a war."

We are asking Americans to think about that because how do you ask a man to be the last man to die in Vietnam? How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?....

You can read the whole text of that speech in a
history forum here.

What strikes me today, however, is a very real difference between Senator Kerry veteran of Viet Nam and the Senate and Barack Obama.  In the intervening years John Kerry has seen politics in Washington up front and first hand.  He's become hardened...he's seen the slime ...and the slime has shaped him.  He's doesn't convey the same idealistic "audacious hope" that must have inspired him to write the closing words of his Senate testimony:

We wish that a merciful God could wipe away our own memories of that service as easily as this administration has wiped away their memories of us. But all that they have done and all that they can do by this denial is to make more clear than ever our own determination to undertake one last mission - to search out and destroy the last vestige of this barbaric war, to pacify our own hearts, to conquer the hate and fear that have driven this country these last ten years and more. And more. And so when thirty years from now our brothers go down the street without a leg, without an arm, or a face, and small boys ask why, we will be able to say "Vietnam" and not mean a desert, not a filthy obscene memory, but mean instead where America finally turned and where soldiers like us helped it in the turning.

You and I both know, that a man who could stand up  and say that to the Senate after returning from combat in  Viet Nam...a man who at that time we can be sure had political ambitions, but was essentially a promising nobody...knows something to this day about the audacity of hope.

I trust John Kerry, and I can hear that heartfelt hope when he speaks and in HOW he's trying to run his campaign.

I don't know if he's gonna win.  I don't know if he's gonna do everything the way I would prefer if he does.  He may be in the profoundly ironic position of being a war time President inheriting another President's war.

I do know this:  the battle we are engaged in the election season is worth the effort we've put into it...and our candidates are very much worth fighting for.  The folks who are sliming him..the folks who are distorting who WE are and what WE stand for by attacking him...are not going to do anything different than what they've done for the last thirty years.

And the media aren't going to bend over backwards to help us out.

But...friends...it's September..it's Kerry/Edwards, and if there's one lesson we all here should have learned this election cycle it's this:  nothing matters so much as when  people really start making up their minds.  

Not the polls, not the tempests in teapots of cable news, not the malarky of the riling bloggy waters.  If we do what is right..and we fight the fight we've been given to the best of our abilities then we have earned the right to an audacious hope.  We're not going away.  We're not going to stop fighting.  

Despite all the turmoil and the rough poll news, I can honestly say I am glad I am in the same party as Barack Obama and John Kerry. And I am proud to think that, on some level, I share with all of you here, the kind of hope that Kerry and Obama speak of.

Let's go out and kick some GOP ass.

Tags: Barack Obama (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 31 comments

  •  Thank you (none / 0)

    Thank you for this diary.
    •  No. (4.00 / 22)

      Thank you for reading it.

      Have a great Labor Day weekend.

      Peaceout, kid o.

      •  As a Person (none / 0)

        with severe depression for at least two decades, this post/diary speaks to me in words sometimes I think only I can understand.

        It is hard to hope, and and in my worst moments, the fear of being able to hope for a better day has caused many hard-wrought hours of despair.

        I think that hope is all we really ever have.  Hope is what allows a person to think that they are beter than they think they are; it allows a person to think that, yes, they are valuable, that there is some hope in the future.

        If nothing else, this diary should help people who think there is no hope left.  I think all of us critical thinking people have problems with hope sometimes.  I think that when a glimmer of hope shines through the clouds of despair, it gives all of us a reason to go on and fight the good fight, to see the inherent good in people in general, and to know that there IS a brighter tomorrow out there, somewhere.

        By the way, I taped most of the speeches from the DNC in real time, so I can watch them and give copies to people who need hope or a reason to vote this year.

        Well, I say to them tonight, there's not a liberal America and a conservative America -- there's the United States of America. There's not a black America and white America and Latino America and Asian America; there's the United States of America. The pundits like to slice-and-dice our country into Red States and Blue States; Red States for Republicans, Blue States for Democrats. But I've got news for them, too. We worship an awesome God in the Blue States, and we don't like federal agents poking around our libraries in the Red States. We coach Little League in the Blue States and have gay friends in the Red States. There are patriots who opposed the war in Iraq and patriots who supported it. We are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America.       Barack Obama

        Mark

  •  I agree Obama rocks! (none / 0)

    And hope is a very good thing to have. Hope for a better American and a better future. Which is one of the things that attracted me to Dean. But hope can also be blinding. The head of the DNC is TOO hopeful. I realize it's his job to spin everything to a positive tone. But he's so full of optimism that he believes his own spin and it seems like he has blinders on.

    When you're faced with a problem it's good to be hopeful, and it's good to be optimistc but lets be careful not to become niave or delusional.

    Shameless Plug: Check out my band Losers of the Year we rock if I do say so myself.

    by DeanDemocrat on Sun Sep 05, 2004 at 12:02:14 AM PDT

    •  Exactly... (none / 0)

      it's about a better tomorrow...and the very prosaic bricks and asphalt of the roads that get us there.

      In our case, the hope train got waylaid this August by a media flurry epitomized by some phrases that Bob Dole will die regretting.  Too bad for him.  He still had a shred of dignity before he went off on Kerry.

      He won't be last Republican to make a fool of himself on the way out.

    •  Re: I agree Obama rocks! (none / 1)

      "But hope can also be blinding. The head of the DNC is TOO hopeful. I realize it's his job to spin everything to a positive tone. But he's so full of optimism that he believes his own spin and it seems like he has blinders on."

      Terry McAuliffe is not a strategist.  It doesn't matter if he has blinders on.  He's not making strategic decisions.

      His job is to cheerlead and fundraise.  And he's been far better at those tasks than many around here give him credit for.  He'll be gone in a year, and some who don't like him now may well appreciate him in retrospect.

      •  Don't count on it (none / 0)

        People blame Terry for anything and everything. The far-right have the Clintons to use as the bogeyman; the far-left has Terry Macauliffe. Once he's gone they will just say he's pulling the strings of whoever replaces him.
      •  If Terry's job is to cheerlead (none / 0)

        Then who's job is it to create strategy? Cahill? Is it usually the campaign manager of a candidate who formulates strategy for an entire party? If so, who was formulating strategy prior to Kerry's nomination? Someone tell me who that was/is.

        Preserve democracy, cancel your cable

        by The past is over on Sun Sep 05, 2004 at 06:18:13 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Everyone and No one (none / 0)

          That was the problem.  Without a nominee, there isn't a "party strategy."  There are only people with ideas, some of whom have constituencies and/or organizations, and elected officials, some of whom have ideas.  There isn't, really, any "Democratic Establishment" that runs things in the absence of a presidential candidate.

          John McCain--he's not who you think he is.

          by Mimikatz on Sun Sep 05, 2004 at 10:57:46 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Well then there is the rub (none / 0)

            If I had to pick one person who figured out how to galvanize the Democratic base it was Howard Dean. If the Democratic establishment cared more about America than power - or even winning - the would have kept Dean on as a major party spokesman to help formulate a party agenda.

            Preserve democracy, cancel your cable

            by The past is over on Sun Sep 05, 2004 at 07:45:32 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  Theoden and Aragorn (4.00 / 3)

    ... charging out of Helm's Deep to meet the onslaught.

    I'm tellin' ya.

    (And, frankly, we're not in nearly as bad a spot as they were in terms of this campaign... though I do think we're in that bad a spot in terms of our larger fight against tyranny.)

  •  I recommend this diary... (4.00 / 3)

    I could not agree more with your assessment of Barack Obama's speech and, in my mind, his way of thinking is not only the hope of the Democratic party but of the country. Somehow we need to get out of this poisonous 'winner take all, no holds barred' system that has developed. I also agree that the young Kerry was a man of principles and (as others have said) his real heroism was seen after he returned from Vietnam. But I would disagree with your idea that the years in the Senate have hardened Kerry, IMO those long years in DC softened him, he became part of the money-corrupted system and he stopped challenging the status quo (and married a wealthy Republican widow and has everthing he could want). I cannot imagine what is in Kerry's heart, but I think he's intelligent and when it comes to issues and judicial appointments, well Bush is just plain scary. But our political system which relies on honest debate and discussion is falling apart, it has never been and never will be perfect, but it is getting worse and is eroding before our eyes. [BTW, this is the first diary I have recommended, thanks.]
    •  Sen. Kerry (4.00 / 2)

      His 1971 words were beautiful and effective.  It took real courage to say those words then, and he's still paying the price now.  A man who can say that is the man we need as President, not a man who can't admit he's made a mistake.

      McCain: Less jobs, more war.

      by Unstable Isotope on Sun Sep 05, 2004 at 06:14:52 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  One thing you can see (none / 1)

      Is how he is running this campaign.  If you seek out his speeches (because they don't get near as much coverage as Bush speeches), you find that he is speaking the truth.  He is talking honestly about the state the US is in, and what we can do to make it better.  

      He has chosen not to fight dirty in this campaign, while dirt is being continually thrown at him.  I believe that he knows that the fight is about America.  Will we turn to our highest ideals or turn away to petty, spoiled infighting?

      If he can't open a space where Americans can enter and be unified, how can he provide that space for the world we he tries to unify it around Iraq?

      He is fighting the hopeful fight for the soul of America, and he is not going to degrade us or himself in the battle.

      •  Local (4.00 / 2)

        A lot of people here are complaining about not seeing Kerry/Edwards on the national media much. But because of the way they're running the campaign, they don't have to. They're fighting the disinformation and spin at the local level. Tens of thousands attend their rallies, hear them speak, then go home and look at the TV and think "That doesn't sound like the man I just saw. Can I really trust [insert major news network here]?" And to make it worse, their surrogates are out there doing the same thing. People who liked Dean in the primaries (and there were a lot of them, enough to put him in a solid second/third even after the media had been tearing him apart for months) see him speak about how great Kerry is and think "Wow. Maybe I should go out and register more voters and put up some yard signs and sell a few bumper stickers..."

        Its a style of campaigning Rove's centralized, top-down, news-cycle-oriented model just can't understand. It remains to be see whether they can compete, but as Kerry seems to have turned a 6-point Bush bump back into a tie over the Labour Day weekend...

  •  From way far away in (4.00 / 6)

    Califiornia I waited a long time to hear Obama speak.  That's the reason I'll never abandon TV and the reach, however it be made, of faces and voices.  First I heard a clip in summer, then another then another.  Then the speech.  It isn't even the words.  Any one may be handed fine, even grand words and thoughts.  It's him.

    If there is an inheritor to RFK it's Obama. RFK, who truly from his childhood home and early career saw up close the grind and the darkness of politics, even was part of it... (oh that Camelot business came late to the game) much less the losses and theft of hope of the 60s and yet what made the difference, he kept going and finally, finally connected to the American people.  That is the hope of Obama.

    Someone keep him safe.

    •  Camelot (none / 1)

      More Bouvier than Kennedy, no?  You don't hear much Casals in the alleys of Dorchester and the South Boston waterfront--or at least you didn't in those days.  

      Growing up as Joe's sons, and even more, Honey Fitz's grankids, the Kennedys certainly got their exposure to the brutal roots of modern American politics.  After all, the tremendous family political traditions on both sides had been crushed by the same man, James Michael Curley.

      But now even Camelot recedes into dim memory, so what of the politics of Curley and beyond, to Honey Fitz and Patrick Kennedy, how forgotten is that?  Consarn all these young whippersnappers nowadays, they need to be forced to read "The Last Hurrah" before they talk about politics, harrumph!

    •  RFK and Obama (none / 1)

      The great thing (to me) about RFK in his last campaign was his ability to connect with white working class men and with Black people in Bedford-Stuyvesant and all over the country. He spoke at once to the poor and to the aspirations of idealistic 20 somethings like me and so many others.   His kind of charisma is the only antidote to the Kansas Syndrome and the politics of resentment.  A voice that dares to tell us things can be better, instead of a snarl that things aren't as good as they were.  Obama does seem to be the only one on the horizon like that today.

      John McCain--he's not who you think he is.

      by Mimikatz on Sun Sep 05, 2004 at 11:11:02 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  whole speech (4.00 / 2)

    Don't forget, you can get the entire speech here.

    I like to go back and relive every once in awhile.

  •  nah (3.50 / 2)

    I credit Terry with getting our party out of debt. He did a lot of good in rebuilding us. The problem I have with him is the DNC has been totally useless this year. Where the hell were they during the Republican Convention?

    The DNC should be more than just a bulk mailing piggy bank. And the DNC chair should be orchastrating massive rebuttle campaigns whenever Bush's people go on a blitz.

    And I don't mean just talking about how cool we are! Try dismantling their platform, their record, their agenda, their ideology. This has to be the most simplistic group of people we've ever had running our country but the Democrats are scratching their heads wondering how to beat Bush.

    It's simple, he's an incumbent who hasn't achieved a damn thing that helps the majority of people. Everytime he makes a promise for the next 4 years ask why he didn't do it in the last four years? Better yet, ask why he blocked it, or cut funding for it. They keep track of this stuff. USE HIS RECORD AGAINST HIM!

    Bush is giving them all sorts of openings. Exploiting the deats of 911, flat out LYING about things that are common knowledge like the Patriot Acts negative effects. This is a no brainer, when you are the challenger you have to challenge the incumbents record and dog him every step of the way.

    This is like Politics 101 and our party seems to have forgotten it all.

    Shameless Plug: Check out my band Losers of the Year we rock if I do say so myself.

    by DeanDemocrat on Sun Sep 05, 2004 at 02:57:21 AM PDT

  •  Bravo, Kid! (none / 0)

    It's not EASY  to try do what's right, and, at the same time, to play in the hardball world of American politics.

    I've been pondering that all day. I think I've been tuning in to the pundits too much, and spending too much time on the blogs, because there are many voices saying that "Kerry needs to hit back", "Kerry is a weak candidate for the Democratic Party", Kerry this and Kerry that, a lot of it coming from our fellow Dems.

    Well, I'm a rank beginner at this stuff, and I don't know what the right answer is. Like you kid, but I also find myself trusting Kerry, and the turning point for me may well have been that ridiculous hamster story.

    If Kerry can find that part of himself that spoke so eloquently and passionately some 30+ years ago and merge that with his accumulated wisdom, he'll have this thing in the bag. I think he's getting there. He's showing flashes of passion, and he's mostly speaking plain English (having had to unlearn Senatese).

    Like kid oakland, I've seen the face of the GOP. Nothing could be starker than comparing the two keynote speaks, Barack Obama and Zell Miller. I know that I'm in the right party. The audacity of hope indeed.

    PS: That doesn't mean we don't work our asses off until Nov. 2nd! John Kerry's called upon us for our help (which is more than Dubya's ever done) .

    "[Republicans] swapped principle for power. They ended up with neither. They deserved to lose." --Alan Greenspan

    by lanshark on Sun Sep 05, 2004 at 03:01:56 AM PDT

  •  I did the same thing (4.00 / 3)

    this morning.

    This week left me feeling dirty and scared and angry ... reading not only the Republican speeches but also about the treatment of protesters left me feeling ...

    I played Rep. Obama's speech too. I had to. I was compelled to. I NEEDED it.

    I was 8 months old when JFK died. 5 years old when RFK and Dr. King were taken. Hope is a dim memory and video transfers of grainy movies and Oliver Stone translations and fevered imagination.

    Barack (blessed) Obama came on, and I'd heard so much about him, but there it was. That HOPE. I've grown up, and lived, in a world where HOPE was a quaint relic.

    This week, in Madison Square Garden, where I've watched Roger Waters, Bruce Springsteen, Clapton, Dylan and other artists express hope in a hopeless world, a group of angry and corrupt false prophets tried to continue that ugly disregard for HOPE that this country was founded on. So I went back to Obama, to refresh my own fragile vision for the future.

    Several people in this thread have brought up Tolkien, but I think it's telling that those films have been made at this point in history. We are HUNGRY for a cause, a higher calling. We have it, and it's to struggle against the very ugliness of America's refusal to recognize it's own imperfection. We can only become a force for good in the world if we face our own descent into corruption

    I, too, watched Obama again today. It renewed me and reminded me again that we can contend for the good. I am glad for this community of people who see it too. Thanks for this diary: it is always heartening to see that other people see it too.

    •  Hope (4.00 / 16)

      I've grown up, and lived, in a world where HOPE was a quaint relic.

      I was 17 and in a South Carolina high school the day that John Kennedy was murdered in Dallas.  Around 2 PM, the principal announced "The President is dead", and down the hall I heard cheers.

      I was in college (my one deferment) and had just received the notice for my pre-induction physical around the time that Martin Luther King was murdered in Memphis.  I remember very well the cloth-top trucks of the  82nd Airborne rolling through the streets, soldiers standing on the rail leaning back into the olive drab canvas, M-1s at the ready.  I hope I never see a sight like that again.

      I was taking my pre-induction physical on the day after the evening that Robert Kennedy was murdered.  I remember watching on TV the train that carried his body from Washington DC and the people standing by the railroad tracks.  Six people were killed by trying to touch the train as it passed.

      And I remember well the day that hope died.  On May 4, 1970, four students at Kent State University were murdered by the Ohio National Guard.  The next year, the 1970-1971 school year was remarkable for the absence of the anti-war movement on college campuses.  

      The focus moved solely to massive Mobilizations against the war, protests that could not move an adminstration that had in the Biblical phrase, "hardened its heart".  

      It was in this environment that John Kerry's gave his testimony to Congress, on behalf of the veterans sent to an unwinnable war and dishonored because they could not win it.  And not provided the healthcare, education, assistance in purchasing a home or starting a business that was provided to returning World War II veterans.  It was not just about not getting a parade.

      Because of 9/11, many people have made a feeling their enemy; we are afraid; do anything to take this feeling away.  And we fall for the illusion that military action will remove the feeling of terror.  This illusion is corrosive on hope.

      The decision to hope is an act of courage, a polishing away of the corrosion of fear in spite of all evidence and without illusion.

      We fear for the success of this election because we fear for our country, and we fear what our lives in such a country would be like.  We know that others have had to choose among exile, suicide, or submission to tyranny; we do not want that to be our fate.  And we still have time to act.

      The songs of the Civil Rights movement were not just whistling in the dark. "We shall overcome...we are not afraid", "Ain't gonna let nobody turn me round...gonna keep on marching", "We shall not, we shall not be moved..."  They were an expression of resolution and courage and hope.

      Thank you for reminding us of what will see us forward.

      •  That made me weep (none / 1)

        Beautifully written and enlightening to those of us who didn't experience it, except perhaps as children.

        My mother's estimated due date was the day JFK was shot.  I was born nearly a month later.  I have always thought that was a great literary device: hesitation to come into a world like that.

        You write: The decision to hope is an act of courage, a polishing away of the corrosion of fear in spite of all evidence and without illusion.

        Lovely.  I have been thinking, is it hope versus fear? or hope and fear? I live in constant dread, but work as if there is hope.

      •  hey (none / 0)

        Make this a diary so more people can read it.
  •  Eloquent stuff (none / 1)

    Nice to peek out from above the morass of slanders being hurled against John Kerry and the morass of data causing such (largely unnecessary) consternation among dKossers.  I'm not a churchgoer (or synagogue goer), but that was a great sermon ... in the best sense of the word.
  •  Thank you (none / 0)

    Kid Oakland.

    This thread was the just the tonic I needed.

    Dare to hope.

    GWB will pry my 22 and 19 year old sons from my cold dead fingers.

    by Momagainstthedraft on Sun Sep 05, 2004 at 08:05:25 AM PDT

Permalink | 31 comments