Skip to main content

This column on Campus Progress is pretty good, despite the fact that it calls for Democrats to propose a counter-FMA that would make the Defense of Marriage Act part of the constitution! The good points that the column makes are two:

I. Democrats know what they stand for and so does the electorate. They know we deal with corporate cronyism and regulate the environment. They know we'll improve schools. They know we'll balance the budget.

What they don't know is what we stand against. The Right Wing Media like to shout about our Bush-hating and alienation from the mainstream, but the fact is that no one knows who and what makes us angry. Which aspect of society is inimical to our idea of America?

I, for one, am happy to take a stand against creationists and everyone else who hates knowledge. Those people are not consistent with my America. Neither are rapacious CEOs who loot their employees' pensions. We should take advantage of the symbolic strength of opposition--it's a shortcut to a clear-cut position that doesn't require years of think tank position papers.
 

II. Aside from a lack of ideological/partisan machine, growth of importance of social issues, post-Vietnam foreign policy paralysis, etc, the Democrats' fall from power can be chalked up to sheer political incompetence.

That's a point I've been harping on for awhile. In New Jersey, where Democrats are in power and have a functional machine, our politicians know what the hell they're doing! Circumstances have been bleak (McGreevey etc), yet the Republicans never gain the upper hand because we move to counter events as they occur and bend them to our benefit. Take the pay-to-play legislation that just passed the state senate: it probably won't make government too much cleaner, and that's a good thing. But it does ensure that NJ Democrats don't become the party of Charles Kushner, and it was passed a week after a mass arrest of corrupt Republicans.

Why are national Dems, especially so-called moderates, so bad at politics? These southerners see one another drop like flies and STILL play ball with Republicans. Why did the Democrats run one sparsely-attended hearing on bad accounting of Iraq war spending? The country won't punish us for highlighting government waste and cronyism in wartime; quite the contrary, they didn't punish Harry Truman in 1944 or Lyndon Johnson in 1952. Why aren't the Democrats loudly celebrating an election in Iraq and Palestine and democratic inching in Lebanon and Egypt? All the better to remind people that the President went to war based on lies about weapons of mass destruction, and it's the Democrats that are the party of idealism here and abroad.

The electorate isn't stupid, but we continue to treat them as though they are. Democrats seem to have a pathetically basic conception of politics: you either go to the left or go to the center. If you're from a red state, it has to be the latter. Politics is a sophisticated field, and we cannot master it. Our party has very skilled doctors, lawyers, economists, web programmers, electricians, corporate leaders, musicians, airplane pilots, engineers, architects, biologists, and mechanics. Where are our fucking politicians?

Originally posted to Marshall on Tue Mar 01, 2005 at 09:45 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  It's hard to respond... (none)
    ...to what you've written because it is so vague.  You refer to Democrats.  Do you mean your garden variety, because-my-parents-were-Dems-type registered Democrats?  DNC?  DLC?  Congressional party leadership?

    I don't happen to be a registered Democrat, but I am most certainly a member of the energized opposition.  Do you doubt that I know what I stand against?  If you took a poll here at Kos, I think you'd be able to develop a list that most if not all of the folks around here agreed on.

    On the other hand, if you're kvetching about the fact that while our Dem Senators and Representatives "stand" against things that they refuse to STAND against when a vote comes up, then you are indeed preaching to the choir.

    Two-step, lockstep, goosestep: Herr Busch's three-step plan to a righter tomorrow.

    by The Termite on Tue Mar 01, 2005 at 10:54:33 AM PST

    •  Congress (none)
      I was basically talking about the congressional party and, I suppose, the Kerry campaign/John Kerry himself, all of which go out of their way to appeal to supposed aggreived downscale voters and chisel away any image of cultural aloofness with transparent photo ops. And by "stand against," I don't mean opposition to Bush and his policies as a political tactic but opposition to a strain in American society we find unacceptable. It's an under-considered political strategy.

      "We must uphold a familiar commerce together in all meekness, gentleness, patience and liberality."

      by Marshall on Tue Mar 01, 2005 at 12:01:29 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

HK

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site