Several weeks ago a diary was posted here providing the Bush National Guard records provided by the FOIA. These documents support Dan Rather's story on this subject.
Okay, maybe the actual docs Rather had in his possession were "forged," but the information was not forged. Why is this not common knowledge? I realize that this could have been brought up on an open thread, but I really want to know the answer to this question, and open threads seem to me to be a mish-mash of everyone doing their own thing.
I think Dan Rather is really getting beat up on this and I do not understand why???